Blog Subscription via Follow.it

Showing posts with label Italy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Italy. Show all posts

August 16, 2026

Ferragosto Holiday Theft in Messina: Major Works by Antonello da Messina Stolen from the Museo Accascina

Just days after the recovery of three important artworks in Italy, a new museum theft has struck Sicily during Italy's Ferragosto holiday. 

According to the reconstruction by Marisa Mercurio, director of the Museo Regionale Maria Accascina (MuMe) in Messina, unknown individuals entered the building around 9:50 pm on Saturday, 15 August 2026.  This despite alarm systems and CCTV inside the museum.  Entering through a side entrance, with their faces covered, the burglars successfully made off with three of the five surviving panels of Antonello da Messina’s Polittico di San Gregorio,  commissioned in 1473 for the monastery of San Gregorio, together with a separate double-sided devotional panel painting that had been kept in a secured glass display case.

da Messina's Polyptych consists of five panels arranged in two tiers: the lower tier features the Madonna of the Rosary flanked by Saint Gregory the Great and Saint Benedict. The upper tier depicts the Annunciatory Angel and the Virgin, while the central panel, possibly of Christ, was believed to have occupied the centre of the upper register, but disappeared centuries ago.  Immediately after the theft, citizens found the remaining two panels, abandoned on a low wall on Viale Annunziata.

Police and forensic specialists have begun examining the scene of the crime immediately following the discovery of the theft.  The MuMe remained closed to the public on Sunday while investigators worked to reconstruct how the burglars gained access to the building, how long they remained inside, and how they succeeded in removing the paintings.  At the time of this writing, authorities have not disclosed the precise point of entry, the number of individuals involved, or what their initial investigation has determined. 

The timing is difficult to ignore. The theft occurred on 15 August, known in Italy as the Feast of the Assumption, when much of Messina was focused on the city’s famous Vara procession, one of its most important annual religious and civic celebrations which concluded with a long procession, accompanied by a massive crowd, leading the monumental votive "machina" along the traditional route to its arrival in Piazza Duomo, in front of the Cathedral Basilica.  Whether the offenders deliberately selected a night when public attention and local resources were concentrated elsewhere in the city remains to be established, but it is a question investigators will almost certainly consider as they reconstruct the planning behind the burglary.

The choice of a major public celebration as cover for a museum theft has a notable precedent in South America. On 24 February 2006, during Rio de Janeiro’s Carnival, four armed men entered the Museu da Chácara do Céu tole works by Pablo Picasso, Claude Monet, Henri Matisse, and Salvador Dalí. 

The most significant loss in this holiday theft is the partial dismantling of Antonello’s 1473 Polittico di San Gregorio, one of the defining works in the museum’s collection.  The altarpiece was commissioned by Fabria Cirino, abbess of the monastery of Santa Maria extra moenia, known as San Gregorio, in Messina. bWhat remained of the altarpiece had already endured a long history of fragmentation, damage, and conservation before three of its component panel were stolen this weekend.

That history includes the catastrophic 1908 Messina earthquake, which destroyed much of the city and devastated the former monastery of San Gregorio.  The surviving panels of this altarpiece were among the many works exposed to the consequences of that disaster and subsequently underwent repeated conservation treatment.  Their survival in Messina is therefore significant not simply because of Antonello’s importance to Renaissance painting, but because they form part of a cultural patrimony that has already survived extraordinary physical loss.

The fourth work taken is far smaller and, for a thief, considerably easier to move. It is a double-sided devotional panel measuring approximately 15 by 11 centimetres.  This long-debated work, featuring an "Ecce Homo" and a "Madonna and Child with a Franciscan in adoration," was only attributed to Antonello da Messina in 2003, the year in which the Sicilian Region decided to purchase it at auction at Christie's in London and donated it to the Messina museum.  Previously, it had been exhibited in Taormina during the G7 summit.


The small panel has its own complicated history. It was largely unknown to scholarship until it surfaced on the art market at the beginning of this century. Photographs were shown in 2002 to the American art historian Everett Fahy, who attributed the work to Antonello da Messina.  Other specialists later examined it, although aspects of the attribution, including whether both sides were painted by Antonello himself, generated considerable scholarly debate.

Its removal may prove particularly useful to investigators because the panel was housed inside a protected display case. Entering a museum is one stage of a burglary. Successfully removing an object from an additional layer of protection once inside is another. How that case was opened or defeated, and whether the offenders arrived equipped specifically to do so, may help determine how much preparation preceded the theft.

The cultural significance of what has been taken extends well beyond the monetary value that may eventually be assigned to the paintings. Antonello was born in Messina, and surviving works by this artist are rare.  His paintings occupy an important position in the development of Italian Renaissance art, combining an Italian sense of monumentality and space with the precision, luminosity, and oil technique associated with northern European painting.

For Messina, however, Antonello has an additional importance. Much of the historic city and an enormous part of its artistic heritage were destroyed in the earthquake of 28 December 1908. The Museo Regionale developed in large part as a repository for paintings, sculpture, and architectural material recovered from ruined churches, monasteries, and civic buildings and its collections consequently preserve fragments of a city whose physical appearance and cultural landscape were radically altered by this catastrophe.

The institution has, unfortunately, experienced serious losses before. In the early 1950s, art historian Federico Zeri, then a young inspector of the Superintendency of Lazio, together with Ferdinando Bologna and Raffaello Causa (of the Campania section), noticed that a panel displayed as part of a sixteenth-century Flemish triptych appeared to be a modern substitute.  The observation helped expose a much larger pattern of missing works. Subsequent investigations concluded that two hundred and sixty works of art had been stolen over the space of ten years, in some instances with originals apparently replaced by copies.  Only 50 were recovered, while others remained missing.

The circumstances of those historical losses are very different from the forced intrusion reported this weekend, but they underscore a problem familiar to anyone working in cultural property crime: once an artwork disappears successfully into illicit circulation, recovery can become progressively more difficult with each passing year.

The thieves responsible for the present theft now face a different problem. A panel by Antonello da Messina is not an anonymous or easily assimilated commodity.  The Polittico di San Gregorio has been extensively photographed, published, and is  immediately recognisable.  Its surviving components belong to a documented public collection and form part of a famous ensemble. They cannot simply be offered to a reputable auction house or art dealer without attracting unwanted attention.

The small double-sided panel presents much the same difficulty. Its Christie’s history, published photographs, distinctive imagery on both sides, and later acquisition by the Sicilian authorities make it equally identifiable.  That does not, however, mean the objects cannot circulate criminally. 

Famous stolen artworks may be transferred between offenders for a fraction of their legitimate market value, concealed for lengthy periods, used as collateral in other criminal dealings, or retained by thieves who discover that stealing a well-known painting is considerably easier than finding someone prepared to buy it.  

For now, it is also far too early to assume that these works were stolen for a particular collector or as the result of a specific commission.  Much will depend upon what investigators learn from the movements of the offenders once inside the museum and immediately before and after the theft.  

If surveillance footage shows that they entered and went directly to the Antonello works, that may suggest prior knowledge and deliberate selection. If they moved through the galleries considering multiple objects before settling on what they took, a different picture may emerge.

Alarm records, CCTV, tools left behind, traces recovered from the display areas, telephone data, vehicle movements, and the precise method used to access the building will all form part of the reconstruction analysis to be carried out by the Carabinieri Command for the Protection of Cultural Heritage.  The coincidence with the Vara celebrations may also prove important if investigators establish that the offenders had studied local routines and deliberately selected Ferragosto as an opportunity.

For now, what is certain is that a surviving masterpiece which had already endured centuries of dispersal, earthquake, deterioration, and restoration has once again been physically fragmented.

The Polittico di San Gregorio had already lost one of its original panels long ago. Unfortunately, this weekend, on the night of 15 August 2026, thieves took three more.  For Messina, a city whose cultural history has already been marked by exceptional loss, their recovery matters far beyond the walls of the museum.

By Lynda Albertson

August 14, 2026

Three Minutes to Steal, Five Months to Recover: Cézanne, Renoir and Matisse Return


Three works by Paul Cézanne, Pierre-Auguste Renoir, and Henri Matisse, stolen on March 23rd from the Fondazione Magnani Rocca in Traversetolo have been recovered by Italy's Carabinieri following an intense investigation lasting nearly five months.

The recovery was announced today by the Carabinieri of the Parma Provincial Command and the specialist unit of the Comando Carabinieri per la Tutela del Patrimonio Culturale (TPC).  According to authorities, the paintings were located during searches ordered by the Parma Public Prosecutor's Office following what police have described as a complex investigation.  Initially, details were not released concerning precisely where the works were found, in whose possession they were recovered, or whether arrests have been made as the investigative remains active.

The recovered works are:

Paul Cézanne's Tasse et plat de cerises c. 1890 
(One of the painter's rare works in Italy)
Medium: Watercolour paint, and pencil on paper 
38cm x 49 cm


Pierre-Auguste Renoir's Les Poissons, 1917
Medium:  Oil on Canvas
40 x 51.5 cm

Paul Cézanne's Tasse et plat de cerises c. 1890 
(One of the painter's rare works in Italy)
Medium: Watercolour paint, and pencil on paper 
38cm x 49 cm

Collectively, all three works have been valued at more than €9 million.

Three minutes inside the Villa dei Capolavori

Shortly after 2:00 am, on Monday, 23 March 2026, at least four masked accomplices entered the grounds of the Fondazione Magnani Rocca in Mamiano di Traversetolo, approximately 20 kilometres south of Parma, having tampered with barrier rods which were part of a metal gate located along the periphery of the museum's manicured 12-hectare English-style garden near the North and East of the car park.  From there it was a straight walk up the museum's pebbled path to reach the rear of Villa Magnani, also known as Villa dei Capolavori or "Villa of Masterpieces" where they broke in through an entrance door.

The museum occupies the former home of musicologist, critic, and collector Luigi Magnani, whose collection also includes works by Titian, Dürer, Rubens, Van Dyck, Goya, Monet, Morandi, and other major European artists. The three stolen works were displayed together on the upper floor of the villa in the Sala Cézanne, which housed one oil and five watercolours, completed by the artist, and the Sala Impressionisti, which contains works by French masters who are quite rare in permanent Italian museum collections.  

Initial reports described only that masked thieves forcing their way into the building. A fuller reconstruction that has emerged from the investigation, including surveillance footage released following the recovery, reveals an exceptionally rapid operation.

The video released by the Carabinieri shows two masked individuals, equipped with head torches, entering the villa through one of its windows.  A third accomplice can be seen outside, as he is handed the paintings as they are removed.  Investigators believe that at least four people participated in the actual theft operation who were helped by others after the initial theft. Once inside the villa, the thieves moved directly towards the works they intended to take, detaching them from the walls and carrying them back downstairs where they passed them to their waiting accomplice. 

The entire operation took less than three minutes.

Investigators also examined a tractor which had been stolen nearby and subsequently found close to the villa which may have been used to force access through the perimeter gate.

In making their escape, the thieves abandoned a forth artwork, by Renoir belonging to the Magnani collection, titled Paysage de Cagnes. This painting subsequently became particularly important to investigators, who subjected material associated with the attempted removal to forensic examination for fingerprints and biological traces.

The activation of the museum's security systems appears to have shortened the time available to the intruders. The Foundation subsequently stated that the thieves had been prevented from completing their intended actions through the operation of the alarm system and the rapid intervention of internal security personnel, the Carabinieri, and the private security service.

The theft also illustrates an enduring problem in museum thefts: the difference between the theoretical market value of a famous work and the value of a well-documented work of art within an illicit transaction.

A high value Cézanne or Renoir cannot simply be introduced into the legitimate international art market following a widely publicised museum theft. Their images, titles, dimensions, and ownership are readily identifiable, and any attempt to sell them publicly through an established auction house or reputable dealer would immediately raise questions.

That does not however make such works valueless to criminals.

Stolen art can move through a variety of illicit contexts. Works may be concealed for years, transferred between criminal actors at a fraction of their legitimate value, used as collateral in other illicit transactions, or held in anticipation that circumstances may eventually make disposal possible. In other cases, thieves simply discover after the event that stealing a famous painting is considerably easier than converting it into money.

For investigators, the months immediately following a theft can therefore be especially important. Each movement of an object potentially expands the circle of people who know where it is, who has handled it, and who may be prepared to negotiate over it.

Precisely what happened to the Magnani Rocca paintings between March and August was not disclosed this morning, as press releases confirmed only that the paintings had been recovered during a series of prosecutor-authorised searches.

Who planned the burglary? Who selected the objects? Was the theft commissioned, or were the paintings stolen in the expectation that a buyer could subsequently be found? Who concealed them after the theft? Were intermediaries involved? And was an attempt made to monetise them before their recovery, all remain unanswered.

Update:

Later today, I had the opportunity to speak with Lieutenant Colonel Giuseppe Marseglia, the officer responsible for Northern Italy within the Carabinieri Command for the Protection of Cultural Heritage.   He confirmed that the three stolen works were located during the search of a residence (in Mamiano di Traversetolo, in the province of Parma), linked to a group of individuals whom investigators had been monitoring as they worked to establish the whereabouts of the missing artworks.

According to Lieutenant Colonel Marseglia, the group consists of men and women of Moldovan origin who are residents in Italy.  Five individuals were detained today in connection with the investigation:
  • Constantin Ciobanu, born in Moldova on 2 December 1982, domiciled in Parma;
  • Sergiu Matenco, born in Moldova on 1 July 1983, resident in Parma;
  • Mihail Ciobanu, born in Moldova on 25 October 1995, domiciled in Parma;
  • Ion Rotari, born in Moldova on 26 June 1985, domiciled in San Polo di Torrile; and
  • Andrei Ciobanu, born in Moldova on 26 August 1981, resident in Parma.
Nine individuals in total, all Moldovan citizens, are currently under investigation.

Investigators believe members of the organised group may be linked to at least 14 thefts committed in the province of Parma as well as in surrounding areas.  The suspects have been described as experienced offenders, but not as specialist art thieves, nor is there presently any indication that the paintings were stolen to fulfil a specific commission.

Today's recovery was brought about in part by a wider investigative operation in which the Parma Public Prosecutor's Office ordered searches of a number of individuals residing in the provinces of Parma, Reggio Emilia, and Modena.  Approximately one hundred officers participated in the operation, drawn from the Carabinieri Provincial Command of Parma, the Command for the Protection of Cultural Heritage, and the 5th Emilia-Romagna Regiment, along with additional support from the Provincial Commands of Reggio Emilia and Modena.

The scale of the operation reflects the broader scope of the investigation.  Rather than focusing solely on the theft of important art works from the Fondazione Magnani Rocca, investigators were also examining the suspected criminal activities of an organised group of actors believed to have been responsible for a series of property crimes in the region.

In addition to recovering the three artworks, officers executed search warrants authorised by the Parma Public Prosecutor’s Office against 15 individuals suspected of being members of, or accomplices to the identified criminal organisation. These searches led to the recovery of a substantial quantity of stolen property, with an estimated value of tens of thousands of euros.

Today's recovery of the Cézanne, Renoir, and Matisse therefore represents both the return of three important works of art and a significant development in a wider criminal investigation that remains ongoing.

Satisfied with today's recovery, Lieutenant Colonel Marseglia said this was the most important museum theft recovery in Italy since the 2016 recovery of 17 paintings, including works by Peter Paul Rubens, Pisanello, Caroto, Tintoretto and Mantegna, stolen from Verona's Castelvecchio Museum. 

Thankfully, in this instance, the investigating officers were able to carry out their recovery before the artworks could be smuggled out of the country. 

By:  Lynda Albertson

March 31, 2026

The Long Game: Why Organised Crime Holds, Not Sells, What It Steals

When the news of the €11 million museum theft at the Fondazione Magnani Rocca in Traversetolo broke last Sunday, the incident was already six days old.  Shortly after 2:00 am, on Monday, March 23, 2026, at least four masked accomplices entered the museum grounds having tampered with barrier rods which were part of a metal gate located along the periphery of the museum's manicured 12-hectare English-style garden to the North and East of the car park.  From there it was a straight walk up the museum's pebbled path to reach the rear of Villa Magnani, also known as Villa dei Capolavori or "Villa of Masterpieces" where they broke in through an entrance door.

Modern museums design security around deterrence, delay, and response, layered measures which include access control, alarms, CCTV, and rapid police coordination.  All of which are intended to shorten the time between intrusion and intervention.  These thieves seemed to know this and set to work quickly.

Once inside, they quickly climbed the villa's sumptuous staircase, turned left down the hall and made their way into the small gallery on the left, the Sala Cézanne, which housed one oil and five watercolours, completed by the artist.  Selecting one, the thieves removed it from its hook on the wall.

Paul Cézanne's Tasse et plat de cerises c. 1890 
is one of the painter's rare works in Italy
Medium: Watercolour paint, and pencil on paper 
38cm x 49 cm

On that same floor, their second target was the Sala Impressionisti, which contains works by French masters who are quite rare in permanent Italian museum collections.  

There, the thieves selected two small, high-value paintings:


and Henri Matisse's Odalisque sur la terrasse 1922


Pierre-Auguste Renoir's Les Poissons, 1917
Medium:  Oil on Canvas
40 x 51.5 cm
Worth an estimated at €9 million.

Some news reports say that the thieves left behind a second painting by Renoir, the artist's Paysage de Cagnes as the team made their getaway in a 3-minute dash.  Others document that painting was left in place within arm’s reach of the two other work taken from the Impressionist gallery, along with a canvas from the Pourville Cliffs series by Claude Monet and post-war paintings by Hans Hartung, Jean Fautrier, Wols and Nicolas de Staël.

Perhaps the other artworks were too big?  Too many to carry, or time was running out.  One thing is certain, the strike team walked through one gallery to get to the other, making their choice of artworks seem intentional: an operational calculus versus indiscriminate removal.  Pre-selected, portable, and high-value targets, each apparently chosen over other works in the collection. 

One possible motive behind high-value art thefts is their utility within organised crime as instruments of negotiation rather than objects of aesthetic or commercial interest.  Works of art can function as portable leverage, stolen not for their sale's value, they are too recognisable, but for strategic use at some later date as a bargaining tool with judicial authorities. 

In this context, highly recognisable paintings stolen from a museum become a form of currency within the criminal justice system, where cooperation, restitution, or intelligence can be perceived as potentially useful bartering tools, relinquished in exchange for reduced sentences or more favourable detention conditions. The cases of cocaine traffickers Flor Bressers and Raffaele Imperiale illustrate how artworks may be retained by organised crime actors for years before resurfacing (or not resurfacing) as part of broader negotiations, underscoring their strategic value which goes beyond their multi-million dollar price tags.

In Imperiale’s case, his possession of two paintings, View of the Sea at Scheveningen, 1882 and Congregation Leaving the Reformed Church in Nuenen 1884 - 1885,  became a bargaining asset during the fugitive's cooperation with Italian authorities.  When speaking in relation to the stolen paintings, Imperiale indicated that he had purchased (without explaining from whom) "some goods", not simply the two Van Goghs, paying five instalments of one million euros each for a total of €10 million for both paintings.   

Similarly, Belgian drug dealer Bressers, is believed to have used the chat handle Bongoking to discuss the recently filched 17th-century painting, bragging about negotiating a lower purchase price.  

In selected texts released to the public Bongoking writes:

“I recently bought a Frans Hals, 2 laughing boys,” “Paid dearly, brother… Asked for 750, settled for 550.”

 Authorities believe this figure represents €550,000,

Both cases illustrate how the theft, concealment, and circulation of the high-profile stolen painting can be of interest to and circulate within criminal networks before resurfacing in judicial contexts. 

These examples suggest that, for organised crime actors, the true value of stolen art may lie not in its liquidity, but in its capacity to be converted into legal advantage.  In this sense, the thefts of paintings can serve a dual function: both as a criminal enterprise and as a long-term hedge when justice comes knocking. 

By:  Lynda Albertson

January 29, 2026

Meet Our Alumni: From Photochemistry to Art Crime: Catarina Pinto’s Bridge into Cultural Heritage Investigation

Welcome to ARCA’s PG Cert Alumni Spotlight Series, a collection of in-depth Q&A interviews conducted by Edgar Tijhuis*, highlighting the professional journeys, achievements, and ongoing contributions of graduates from ARCA’s Postgraduate Certificate Programs in Art Crime and Cultural Heritage Protection. Through these conversations, we aim to showcase the diverse paths our alumni have taken—across academia, law enforcement, museums, research, policy, and the cultural heritage sector—and to share the insights, motivations, and experiences that continue to shape their work in safeguarding the world’s shared artistic legacy.

What motivated you to enroll in ARCA’s Postgraduate Program?


For me, applying to the ARCA programme meant identifying and consolidating a path that I did not even know existed: the field of criminal investigation within cultural heritage. Forensic investigation had always been a personal goal, and therefore all my academic choices reflect this same ambition. However, there was a moment during my PhD when I started to doubt whether I was on the right path. I questioned whether there was really a bridge between chemistry applied to cultural heritage and criminal investigation. Until, after some research, I found ARCA and, consequently, the programme that confirmed that yes, there was indeed a bridge between cultural heritage and criminal investigation — I just had to start crossing it.

Can you describe a moment in the program that had a lasting impact on you?

Due to its intensity, the programme challenges us in many different areas. We question our personal as well as our professional skills. However, day by day, week by week, we realise that we are capable of facing such a challenge. Thus, what impacted me the most was becoming aware, in situ and through the programme, of my own abilities. I remember that later, in different contexts, I often thought: if I managed to complete the ARCA programme, I can handle/do X.

What was your favorite course or topic, and why did it stand out?

I cannot choose just one topic. Given my completely different background from what was expected and from most of my colleagues — chemistry — I would like to highlight three topics: “Tracking Stolen Art: Progress, Prospects and Limitations of Databases for Stolen Art”, “Provenance Research: Theory and Practice”, and “Museum Safety and Security and Site Architecture”.

These three topics made my eyes shine with enthusiasm and created a strong desire to learn more. Regarding the first topic, I remember thinking throughout the week: “But… this is just the tip of the iceberg! There is a whole world that we do not see”, and I was fascinated by the enthusiasm with which the knowledge was transmitted to us.

The second one, provenance research, for those who love solving puzzles, is like entering a higher level, combined with the lecturer’s expertise, which was conveyed in a captivating and highly engaging way.

Finally, the behind the scenes of museums… I remember the lecturer saying: “After this, you will never look at a museum in the same way again.” And it is true! The hands-on approach is the highlight, combined with the critical assessment we are encouraged to make; for me, this is one of the strongest points of the course.

And regardless of the topic, the enthusiasm that all lecturers transmit is unforgettable. They all teach for a greater good.

How did the international nature of the program influence your learning experience?

Personally, it was quite challenging. Learning and consolidating concepts outside our area of expertise is already demanding itself. Doing so in a foreign language increases the difficulty even more. However, this need for adaptation is excellent for personal and professional growth. At the beginning, it was very challenging and at some moments even discouraging, but over time we open ourselves to the experience, becoming richer and more mentally flexible.

Did the program change or shape your career path? 

Definitely! After the program, I remained ambitious about combining chemistry with the field of Art Crime and Safeguarding. Therefore, I always actively seek opportunities that bring me closer to this goal. At the moment, I am a researcher in the cultural heritage group SCITEC, where, through laboratory studies, we try to respond to museum needs in practical cases related to conservation and prevention.

My perspective, however, goes beyond chemistry. I observe the context of the object, its provenance, and I question more directly aspects such as lighting — where, how, and its specific location in the museum (when relevant). This perspective derives from having participated in the programme. I also continue to stay in touch with projects, workshops, and conferences in order to nurture my enthusiasm and keep myself updated on scientific developments applied to the security and preservation of cultural heritage objects.

What was it like to live and study in Amelia, Italy?

Personally, it was very easy. I loved being in a small place where you can be part of the city and feel at home even though you are foreigner. Amerini welcome you with an open heart.
Depending on your own background and personality, you may experience some difficulties due to it being a small city. However, that the same fact is what makes it so special in everyday life.

If you need help, you will get help. You will be in the heart of Amerini. And this is the most amazing thing about living in Amelia.

Can you share a memorable interaction you had with faculty, guest speakers, or fellow students?

Everyone, from day one, is welcomed as you part of a family. Each year, coming back to the Conference, feels like you never left. It is as if the time had not passed, as if you had not been away for so long. This is my most memorable interaction: feeling welcomed into a family, that you never really left and, experiencing how open the guest speakers are towards the students from the very beginning.

What advice would you give to someone considering applying for the 2026 session?

Be open. Enjoy every little moment – the goods ones, the bads ones and even the boring ones. In the end, you will want to relive it all again, without exceptions. This, is the magic of ARCA’s program.

How has your understanding of art crime evolved since completing the program?

When I enrolled in the program, even my imagination could not predict what I would discover. All the concepts, all the sub-fields. Personally, I have evolved a lot. I started from a point where even the concept of “restitution” was not part of my vocabulary. Now, every piece of news regarding repatriation, safeguarding agreements and so on feels natural.

In one sentence: why should someone join ARCA's program?

It will open your mind to the importance of safeguarding cultural heritage and make you part of a family that works for a greater good.


About dr Catarina M. Pinto

Catarina M. Pinto is a researcher at the Italian National Research Council's Institute of Chemical Sciences and Technologies (CNR-SCITEC, Perugia). She holds a PhD in Photochemistry, focused on the study of photodegradation mechanisms of historical and natural colourants. She also holds Master's degree in Forensic Chemistry applied to cultural heritage and a Postgraduate Certificate in Art Crime and Safeguarding. Her research specializes in the photodegradation studies of organic dyes and pigments, in textiles and paintings, by spectroscopic techniques for the safeguarding of cultural heritage.

* Dr Edgar Tijhuis is Academic Director at ARCA and is responsible for coordinating ARCA’s postgraduate certificate programs. Since 2009, he has also taught criminology modules within ARCA's PG Certification programming. For more info about the program, contact Edgar Tijhuis, or contact ARCA via the link below.

📌 ARCA Postgraduate Certificate Programmes (Italy | Summer 2026)

• Post Lauream I (22 May – 23 June 2026): PG Cert in Art & Antiquities Crime

• Post Lauream II (26 June – 26 July 2026): PG Cert in Provenance, Acquisition & Interpretation of Cultural Property

 Take one track—or combine both in a single summer.




December 30, 2025

Meet Our Alumni: ARCA PG Cert Spotlight Series — Aubrey Catrone, Provenance Researcher and ARCA Alumna

Welcome to ARCA’s PG Cert Alumni Spotlight Series, a collection of in-depth Q&A interviews conducted by Edgar Tijhuis*, highlighting the professional journeys, achievements, and ongoing contributions of graduates from ARCA’s Postgraduate Certificate Programs in Art Crime and Cultural Heritage Protection. Through these conversations, we aim to showcase the diverse paths our alumni have taken—across academia, law enforcement, museums, research, policy, and the cultural heritage sector—and to share the insights, motivations, and experiences that continue to shape their work in safeguarding the world’s shared artistic legacy. 

What motivated you to enroll in ARCA’s Postgraduate Program?


From a young age, I was very passionate about art history and history in general. I believed, and continue to believe, that every work of art has a story to tell. And that story is rooted in an object’s unique history.

As an undergraduate, I really had no idea how to turn this passion into a career. That is until the field of provenance research captured my attention - the perfect avenue through which to marry my interests. And it was the discovery of the ARCA post graduate program that I knew would help me turn my passion into professional practicality.

Can you describe a moment in the program that had a lasting impact on you—personally or professionally?

When my class visited the Etruscan necropolis of Cerveteri, we saw evidence of looted tombs and pottery fragments strewn across the forest floor. This gave a chilling context to the laundering of art objects that have been ripped from their original locations and later emerge on the fine art market. And, it reinforced my passion for ensuring that art objects traverse the art market with a correct and complete biography.

What was your favorite course or topic, and why did it stand out?

While not a course when I originally took the course in 2015, but Marc Masurovsky’s provenance course has become a favorite of mine. Marc’s experience in the field is unparalleled. And, he fosters lively discussions where students can explore the intricacies of issues that are often reduced to a bulleted list of names.

How did the international nature of the program influence your learning experience?

The international nature of the program exposes students to a myriad of professional and cultural backgrounds. From those who have managed cultural heritage sites to law enforcement to auction house representatives, ARCA undermines the “victimless” crime narrative, exposing students to the myriad perspectives and long-lasting effects of art and cultural heritage crime.

Did the program change or shape your career path? 


Absolutely! I entered the ARCA Program seeking to better understand how I could enter the world of provenance research. During the program, I was exposed to foundational knowledge that I continue to use in my day-to-day practice. ARCA also introduced me to a community of professionals that helped shape my career path after the program. For example, I found volunteer and internship opportunities through the ARCA networking community. I am also still close with many of my classmates, even working with some on a regular basis, over ten years later.

What was it like to live and study in Amelia, Italy?

Given the location and size of the town, Amelia offered the perfect environment to live and breathe art crime while also fully immersing myself in a traditional Italian lifestyle.

What advice would you give to someone considering applying for the 2026 programs?

In my opinion, ARCA is the most practical post-graduate program focusing on art crime and cultural heritage protection available. All classes are taught by experience professionals with real-life experience in their course topics. For example, students learn how to identify and investigate red flags in provenance entries from experts who have worked on actual restitution and repatriation cases.

My advice here is to use this exposure to your advantage. The professors are in Amelia to share their knowledge and help train professionals who will advance ARCA’s missions. So - questions, network, and absorb what you can.

How has your understanding of art crime evolved since completing the program?

ARCA helped build the foundations of my understanding of art crime beyond the most well-known sensational cases or films. This is not entirely a world of smash and grab antics like most recently exhibited at the Louvre. In many cases that I work on, we are dealing with questions of fraud, misrepresentation, or lack of documentation. These are often crimes of opportunity that happen at all levels of the art market.

In one sentence: why should someone join ARCA's program?

ARCA welcomes attendees to a community that extends beyond the historic walls of Amelia in its pursuit to advance art crime and cultural heritage protection literacy.


About Aubrey Catrone

Aubrey Catrone is an art historian, appraiser, and provenance researcher. Aubrey earned an MA in the History of Art from University College London, specializing in the documented histories of art objects. With an art gallery and academic research background, Catrone founded Proper Provenance, LLC to provide her clients with the tools, not only to historically contextualize art, but also to shed light on attribution and legal title within the international art market. She is an Accredited Member of the Appraisers Association of America with a specialization in Impressionist & Modern Art.

Catrone has researched artworks including paintings, works on paper, prints, and sculptures spanning Old Masters to Ultra Contemporary. She has appeared as a guest expert on the History Channel and published her scholarship in a variety of publications including RICS Journals and the Journal of Art Crime.

-----------

* Dr Edgar Tijhuis is Academic Director at ARCA and is responsible for coordinating ARCA’s postgraduate certificate programs. Since 2009, he has also taught criminology modules within ARCA's PG Certification programming.

📌 ARCA Postgraduate Certificate Programmes (Italy | Summer 2026)

• Post Lauream I (22 May – 23 June 2026): PG Cert in Art & Antiquities Crime

• Post Lauream II (26 June – 26 July 2026): PG Cert in Provenance, Acquisition & Interpretation of Cultural Property

Take one track—or combine both in a single summer.




December 6, 2025

Historic Renewal of U.S.–Italy Cultural Property Protections at the Museum of Saved Art



Yesterday, at the the Museum of Saved Art in Rome, Italy, the Government of the Italian Republic and the Government of the United States of America formally signed their renewal of their Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on Categories of Archaeological Material of Italy.  Signatories for this important accord were Sarah B. Rogers, Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy in the United States and Alessandro Giuli, Italy's Minister of Culture.  Their signing of this agreement extends a partnership that has shaped international cultural heritage policy for decades.

The event opened with remarks by Federica Rinaldi, Director of the Museo Nazionale Romano, who underscored the significance of the re signing of the agreement within the context of Italy’s deeply layered cultural landscape.  
Representing Italy were Generale di Brigata Antonio Petti of the Comando Carabinieri per la Tutela del Patrimonio Culturale and officers from Italy’s heritage crime unit, whose work remains central to the protection of the nation’s archaeological patrimony. The United States delegation included Special Assistant Nicole Colameta, Foreign Service Officer at the U.S. Department of State, Rachel Cooke, Minister Counselor for Public Diplomacy, Katherine Gonzalez, Special Advisor to the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy, and Karen Schinnerer, Press Attaché for the Office of Public Diplomacy.

Now extended for an additional five years, the re-signing of this agreement by both countries marks the 25th anniversary of this bilateral instrument.  As such, the accord reflects an ongoing commitment by both nations to confront the illicit trafficking of archaeological and historical materials, a problem that continues to threaten the preservation of global heritage which impacts both source and market countries. 

The first iteration of this agreement was negotiated by the United States Department of State in 2001 pursuant to U.S. legislation implementing the 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. At that time Italy was confronting significant and widespread looting of archaeological sites, including those associated with Etruscan, Roman, and Greek civilizations. The United States, as a principal destination within the global art market, collaborated closely with Italy to establish a framework that would restrict the importation of undocumented antiquities and reinforce legitimate avenues for scholarly research and cultural exchange. The agreement sought to diminish the financial incentives that drive illicit excavation by preventing the sale and circulation of objects lacking a documented and lawful provenance.

Over the years this memorandum has been renewed on several occasions, with each renewal expanding cooperation between law enforcement agencies, customs authorities, academic institutions, and museums. The partnership has led to the successful recovery and repatriation of numerous artefacts, strengthening the legal and ethical standards that govern the movement of cultural property.

The 2025 renewal preserves import restrictions on designated categories of Italian cultural objects and enhances information sharing on theft, trafficking networks, and the illicit art trade. It also reinforces commitments to joint research, training programs, and conservation efforts that support responsible stewardship of archaeological and historical materials.

Officials from both countries emphasised that the re signing of this agreement represents more than a legal instrument and affirmed that, without the sustained dedication of law enforcement and prosecutorial partners in the United States, including the FBI, HSI ICE and the New York District Attorney’s Office -Manhattan Antiquities Trafficking Unit, as well as in Italy, notably the Comando Carabinieri Tutela Patrimonio Culturale, the numerous restitutions of cultural property stolen in Italy and returned from the United States, presented at this important event would not have been possible. Their collective efforts to combat cultural property crime and to ensure the return of unlawfully removed heritage to its rightful country of origin were recognised as essential to the continued success of this bilateral cooperation.

As both nations look ahead to the next five years of cooperation, the renewed memorandum stands as a clear affirmation of their shared responsibility to safeguard the world’s cultural legacy. By supporting these legal frameworks, enhancing professional collaboration, and supporting the ethical circulation of cultural material, Italy and the United States reaffirm their commitment to protecting heritage for future generations. This continued partnership not only counters the harms inflicted by the illicit trade in antiquities but also promotes mutual understanding, respect, and stewardship between two countries united in their dedication to preserving the irreplaceable record of human history.

October 20, 2025

The Aboutaam Brothers, Phoenix Ancient Art, and the Hidden Routes of Italy’s Lost Antiquities

Phoenix Ancient Art - BRAFA 2019 

With a precautionary seizure order, filed by the Rome Public Prosecutor's Office, led by Prosecutor Stefano Opilio, nearly three hundred ancient Italian artefacts may finally be coming home after years of investigative work marking the judgement as one of Italy's most important cultural recoveries in recent history.  

This recovery finds its roots in a multi-year operation linking the Italian Carabinieri’s Cultural Heritage Protection Command with prosecutors in Rome and the United States, as well as Belgian investigative and judicial authorities.

Acting on a European seizure order issued in July 2025 officials have frozen nearly three hundred artefacts confirmed or strongly suspected to be of Italian origin.  These were identified as being tied to storage facilities in Belgium associated with the owners of the art gallery Phoenix Ancient Art, Hicham and Ali Aboutaam.  

Some of the artefacts identified in this operation coincide with business record documentation police obtained during a lengthy group pf investigations into the illicit dealings of  ancient art dealers Robert Hecht, Giacomo Medici, Gianfranco Becchina and Robin Symes, as well as a large dossier of material recovered from the prolific tomb raider Giuseppe Evangelisti.

While this blog has dedicated ample articles on the problematic art dealers mentioned above, we have never covered Evangelisti in the past.  His involvement in the illicit trade was first identified during Operation Geryon just before Christmas in 2003, when officers overheard a conversation during wire taps which referred to someone nicknamed “Peppino il taglialegna”—Peppino the woodcutter, a name derived from the individual's “day job”, providing firewood to two villages.  At night however, Evangelisti moonlighted as a tombarolo,  scavenging the hillsides for Attic and bucchero ceramics, bronze statues and various terracotta finds primarily used in funerary contexts. 

Luckily for investigators, when they raided Peppino's home near Lake Balsena they found not just the fruit of his recent clandestine labours but a batch of books on a shelf (nine books of agendas and seven albums) which documented the extent of his looting from 1997 to 2002.   A virtual goldmine for investigators, the albums contained photographs of every object he had ever looted, even going so far as to record the depth underground of the objects he illegally excavated.  In her review of these journals and albums, former Villa Giulia employee Daniela Rizzo stated that in her twenty-six years of experience, Evangelisti was the only person, aside from Giacomino (Medici), who recorded such detailed records of his activities. 

But back to the Belgium Recoveries

The recoveries announced today are due in part to the New York investigation into the purchasing activity of problematic hedge fund billionaire Michael Steinhardt who not only surrendered $70 million in plundered antiquities, but was the first collector in the United States to be handed a lifetime ban from antiquities collecting. That District Attorney's Office investigation, conducted by the Antiquities Trafficking Unit in Manhattan, uncovered a series of clandestine networks responsible for supplying looted Mediterranean objects to museums, collectors, and gallerists in the United States. 

Following up on that US investigation, a joint Italian-Belgian investigative team was formed expanding Italy's inquiry into northern Europe’s illicit art-dealing hubs and exploring the Aboutaam's footprint in Belgium.  This European investigation allowed for the cross-referencing of some 283 artefacts identified in Belgium, documented in Italian police databases and dealer archival photos.  That number in turn  demonstrates that despite numerous seizures in the US and Europe, the transnational ancient art market, despite decades of scandals, continues to recycle problematic artefacts extracted from clandestine digs.

According to Italy prosecutors Giovanni Conzo and Stefano Opilio, 132 of the seized works can be definitively linked to Italian sites, while the remaining artefacts almost certainly share the same illicit origin. The order, upheld by the Court of Appeal, described the pieces as the product of “illegal provenance” and repeated violations of cultural-property law.

Through it all Phoenix Ancient Art, long considered one of the most prominent galleries dealing in classical antiquities, once again finds itself at the center of controversy.  While the Aboutaam brothers have not been charged in connection with the Italian-Belgian operation, their business history is inseparable from the problematic story of the antiquities trade. 

In January 2023 at the Geneva police court, Ali Aboutaam was sentenced by the Swiss authorities following a complex and multi-year criminal and procedural investigation by officers and analysts with Switzerland's customs and anti-fraud divisions, working with the Geneva Public Prosecutor's Office.  The Swiss-based merchant had earlier been found guilty of forgery of titles.  In that case the courts also confirmed the seizure of 42 artefacts, confiscated due to their illicit origin. 

For Italian authorities, the current case is less about one gallery than about dismantling a system that has long allowed cultural property to vanish from archaeological landscapes and reappear behind glass cases thousands of kilometres away. The artefacts now bound for Rome belong, by law, to the Italian state’s “unavailable assets,” meaning they can neither be privately owned nor sold and their repatriation signals both a practical and symbolic victory for Italy’s Carabinieri TPC, which has spent decades tracking stolen heritage across the world’s galleries, auction houses and art fairs.

The anticipated return of these objects does more than close a legal chapter, it again  underscores how the same names, archives, and networks continue to bear fruit in terms of recoveries, even twenty years after the Medici conviction and the scandals that rocked museums in the 1990s and early 2000s. The discovery in Brussels suggests that, despite improved international cooperation, large caches of looted antiquities remain hidden in private storage and corporate collections.

July 3, 2025

These legal requirements are designed to prevent the illicit removal of historically or culturally significant objects, allowing authorities to assess each item’s provenance and value before it crosses borders.

Following a two-year investigation, culminating in a coordinated effort between Spain’s Guardia Civil and Italy’s Carabinieri Command for the Protection of Cultural Heritage, 62 valuable cultural assets were repatriated to Spain today under the banner of Operation Altarpiece in a ceremony held at the “Swiss Guards Hall” of the Royal Palace in Turin.  The investigation was directed by Investigating Court No. 1 of Marbella, which worked closely with Eurojust to coordinate international legal cooperation. 

The case began in June 2023 when the Guardia Civil received intelligence via Europol’s Secure Information Exchange Network Application (SIENA), alerting them to the seizure in Italy of a carved polychrome and gilded wood altarpiece, with scenes of the Passion of Christ from the 16th century.  This religious work of art had been illegally exported from Andalusia five years after Spanish authorities had denied its earlier export request, made by the now-deceased German couple who had been residing in Marbella (Málaga).

Under Spanish law, cultural properties of this nature—i.e., artworks over 100 years old, included in the General Inventory of Movable Property of Historical Heritage, or valued above specific monetary thresholds (ranging from €15,000 for drawings, engravings, and photographs to €150,000 for paintings)—require a definitive or temporary export permit.  The seized altarpiece in question lacked any of these necessary authorisations.

As the investigation expanded, authorities focused on tracing how this altarpiece had been removed from Spain and transported into Italy and whether the object's holders had trafficked any additional artworks out of the country.  During their subsequent investigation, officers determined that over 90 cultural objects had been exported from Marbella using a non-specialised transport company which moved Renaissance panel paintings, some configured as triptychs, sculptures, vases, tapestries, French 17th and 18th century furniture, and works attributed to artists such as Amedeo Modigliani, Auguste Rodin, and Pieter Brueghel, (the younger).

Italian investigators located many of these works in the villa of Günter Hans Ludwig Kiss, on the shores of Lake Maggiore in Lesa, the same home where the altarpiece had been recovered.  Other works were traced to art galleries, as well as private residences, in Genoa and Milan.   Still others had been sold onward and re-exported from Italy to a third country.  Kiss, the controversial German garbage magnate, was once listed in the top 300 list of rich businessmen in Switzerland, and died, at the age of 81, on 04 February 2023, a few weeks after his wife's own death.  

While alive, the German entrepreneur was involved in numerous legal cases: both civil and criminal for his waste management activities. In the 1990s, he was placed trial for environmental crimes committed with the commissioning of a Thermoselect plant.  Having sold their properties in Switzerland and Spain, and without heirs, the Kiss assets, contested by creditors, were slated to go to the Kan Foundation, a non-profit organisation only established in the tax haven of Liechtenstein in 2023.

As a result of thier line of inquiry, the Spanish court issued multiple European Investigation Orders to judicial authorities in Italy and Germany, along with an International Letter of Request to the United Kingdom, seeking the restitution of the works located in each of the aforementioned jurisdictions.

On Thursday, 16 December 2021, at least two of the seized paintings on view during today's restitution ceremony had been consigned for sale to Cambi Casa d'Aste for an Old Masters sale held at Castello Mackenzie in Genova (Italy).  The first being this early 16th century painting, representing the Madonna and Child with Saint Anne believed to have been painted by members of the Antwerp School, the painting is estimated to be worth between €30,000 to €50,000. 

and this 16th century, 'Triptych depicting the Holy Family and angels' also from the Antwerp School values at between €20,000 and €30,000.


Given that no provenance details accompanied either advertisement for this auction,  one also needs to look closely, not only at the business mogul Günter Hans Ludwig Kiss, but at the origins of these Antwerp School works in relation to World War II-era claims. 

No rules followed, too few questions asked

This restitution case underscores the importance of applying for, and legally obtaining, export permits for cultural property when transferring art works from one country to another.  Legal requirements such as these are designed to prevent the illicit removal of historically or culturally significant objects, and allows national cultural authorities to assess each item’s provenance and artistic importance to the nation prior to authorising removal. 

The investigation also highlights the lack of consistent due diligence on the part of some art market resellers in verifying the legal status of artworks before accepting them for purchase or agreeing to take them under consignment. 

Due diligence is not simply best practice—it is essential for safeguarding a nation’s heritage and ensuring transparency and accountability within the international art trade.  Institutions and private dealers should be prepared to ask potential sellers and consignors tough questions, and to require proof of proper documentation, including export permits when required, in order to prevent inadvertently facilitating the sale of illicit cultural property.  

Failure to do so, or intentionally turning a blind eye, exposes collectors, art dealers, and auction houses to reputational damage and undermines collective efforts to protect cultural heritage from being lost to illicit markets.

By:  Lynda Albertson

January 30, 2025

Judge Rules Against Safani Gallery in Fight Over Stolen Marble Head of Alexander

Image Credit: Safani Gallery TEFAF Maastricht advertisement

On 12 November 2019 Safani Gallery, through their attorney David Schoen, filed a Federal lawsuit in the Southern District of New York seeking a declaratory judgment declaring that Safani Gallery, Inc. seeking, along with damages, a declaratory judgment that the gallery was the exclusive owner of a stolen, circa-1st-century CE, marble Head of Alexander and that the country of Italy had no rights in, or claims to, the artefact.  The case was assigned to US District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, in the Southern District of New York.

On 2 August 2021, Judge Broderick dismissed the case, finding that Italy was protected from being sued in U.S. Court by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA).  Subsequent to that ruling, and through their attorney, Safani then amended its complaint, adding the Italian Ministry of Culture Heritage and Activities and Tourism (“MiBACT”) and the New York District Attorney's Office as defendants, asserting that the DA had violated its Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Italy, its Ministry of Culture, and the DA subsequently sought a dismissal of the Second Amended Complaint filed by the New York antiquities gallery which was  attempting to block the return of the ancient head of Alexander the Great as Helios, the Sun God to the country of its origin. 

On Tuesday, 28 January 2025, Judge Broderick, again, concluded that Italy and its cultural ministry were immune under the FSIA and granted the District Attorney's motion to dismiss the Gallery's amended complaint, additionally finding that Safani lacked Article III standing to bring its federal claims against the State's DA.  Accordingly, Count IV was also dismissed. 

In making his ruling Broderick elaborated:
“A finding that the Manhattan DA violated the Constitution by seizing the Head without probable cause and without due process would not change the fact that only the state court can order the disposition of the Head.”
 
“Finally, although “the state-law issues [are] not so groundbreaking as to preclude the exercise of jurisdiction” under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a)(1), Korshnyi, 771 F.3d at 102, the consideration of comity also weighs in favor of dismissal, because dismissal avoids “needless” federal-court “decisions of state law,” Valencia, 316 F.3d at 305 (quoting United Mine Workers v.Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726 (1966)).”

The backstory on this case

Previously on Monday, 23 July 2018 Matthew Bogdanos, Senior Trial Counsel in the Office of New York County District, through District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr., submitted an Application for Turnover in support of an order pursuant to N.Y. Penal Law §450.10 (Consol. 2017) and N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law §690.55 (Consol. 2017) authorising the transfer of the circa-1st-century CE marble head of Alexander the Great as Helios, the Sun God, seized pursuant to a previously executed search warrant, from the custody of the court, to the custody of Italy.

To that end, and under order of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, the antiquity had been seized at Safani Gallery on 22 February 2018, and was taken into evidence as part of a state investigation seeking to demonstrate the crime of Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the Second Degree.  This seizure was based on suspicions that the object had been stolen and at some point illegally exported from the country of origin in contravention of Italy’s cultural heritage law (No 364/1909).

Since 2018 the object had been retained as evidence by the New York authorities while Safani's complaint and second amended complaint was being heard within the US justice system. 

In terms of its history, DANY's court documents set out that the head was discovered during excavations of the Basilica Aemilia, located on the Via Sacra.  This is the ancient road between the Capitoline Hill and the Colosseum located within the Roman Forum in Rome. While little remains of the Basilica Aemilia today, it was considered by Rome historian Pliny the Elder to be one of the three most beautiful elements of the Roman Forum, this alongside the Forum of Augustus and the Temple of Peace. 

Looking across the remains of the Basilica Aemilia
towards the Severan Arch,
the Tabularium, and the Modern Senate House
Image Credit: B. Dolan
The head was discovered at some point during Italian research excavations carried out by Drs. Professors Giacomo Boni and later by Professor Alfonso Bartoli which were carried out on the Palatine Hill between 1899 and 1939.  Documentation from the excavations suggest that the head belongs to one of the “Statues of Parthian Barbarians” which once adorned the Basilica.

After 20 BCE Roman art often portrayed the people of the Empire and during its restoration in 14 BCE, Augustus chose to line the Basilica with a series of Parthian figurines, perhaps in humiliation of Rome's ancient foreign enemy.  Representing individuals from the Parthian Empire (also known as the Arsacid Empire), these likenesses depicted the conquered Parthians as representatives of the Orbis Alter, subjects of Rome which were not considered to be part of the “civilised” world.  Stylistically, they differ from representations we have from the same period of people from the Orbis Romanus. 

According to court documents, the Italian Soprintendenza alle Antichità Palatino e Foro Romano began keeping archival photographic documentation of the objects discovered during the lengthy excavation starting in 1908.  Based on these records, the head of Alexander the Great, seized from the New York gallery, is believed to have been discovered during the second phase of these excavations which began after 1909. This dating is derived as the Italian authorities have no written, descriptive entries or photographic archival documentation of any marble head finds from the Roman forum of the Barbarian statues prior to 1909.   It was also not until September 1909 that Dr. Professor Bartoli's team began their explorations in the zone of the Basilica Aemilia.  As a result of this and other evidence described in the New York Court's Application for Turnover it seems most likely that the marble head was found sometime around 1910.

Bear in mind 1909 is a critical date as it is this year that Italy's Code of the Cultural and Landscape Heritage (No 364/1909) was made into law.  According to this law, there is a presumption of the State's ownership for all archaeological objects discovered after 1909, unless the cultural Ministry acknowledges that the object does not have a cultural interest, something it would never do for objects located inside Rome's culturally significant Roman Forum.

Italy's archival records from the Forum excavation document an image of the head of Alexander, taken after it was excavated, resting separately on a table at the Museo Forense cloister as well as other photos in which the object is pictured with additional finds.  While the date of the actual theft of this head, and another second missing object which was also stolen, is undetermined, the incident is believed to have occurred sometime before 1959.

What we can define with certainty, on the basis of the dating of the archival photograph, along with the excavation records of the start date of the Basilica site excavation, and documentation of the dates the Museo Forense cloister would have been available to be used as a evidentiary photographic venue, this object indisputably has Italy as its country of origin.  Predicated on the foregoing evidence, it can be proven that the marble head of Alexander was illegally removed from Italian territory after the 1909 law was enacted.

It is on this basis that the object has been defined as stolen property by the State of New York, as its removal from the custody of the Italian authorities was in contravention of the 1909 Italian law.  Also, according to New York law, a thief can never acquire good title.  It should be noted that the removal of the head of Alexander from the Republic of Italy without an export license from the Italian governmental authorities authorising its removal from the territory is also a further violation of Italian law.

Interestingly though, like many stolen works of art illicitly obtained, antiquities remain fairly easy to launder, being sold over and over again through a lack of adequate due diligence in some of the finest, legitimate, marketplaces and to, and through, some of the richest collectors in the world.  

In this instance, the Alexander head has sold in the United States and in the United Kingdom on multiple occasions.

But where was the object bought and sold? 

While the documentation of this object's collection history is spartan, we know that on 22 November 1974 the head of Alexander sold for a mere $650, having been consigned by the Hagop Kevorkian fund to Sotheby Parke Bernet.  Sotheby’s Auction House acquired Parke Bernet Galleries in 1964 and adopted the name Sotheby Parke Bernet throughout the 1970s.  Today, this auction house is known simply as Sotheby’s.  The buyer at the time was listed only as "Altertum Ltd."

Sometime after that date the object was then purportedly purchased by Professor Oikonomides who indicated to others that he purchased the object while vacationing in Cairo, Egypt sometime between 1984 and 1986.  The object was then bequeathed to Dr. Miller by Oikonomides through his estate when he passed away in 1988.

Sotheby's Website Screen Capture
taken 24 July 2018
On 08 December 2011 the object sold at Sotheby's for a second time during Sotheby’s Egyptian, Classical and Western Asiatic Antiquities sale .

At the time of this auction, the purported provenance for the object was listed as:

Hagop Kevorkian (1872-1962), New York, most likely acquired prior to World War II
The Hagop Kevorkian Fund (Sotheby Parke Bernet, New York, November 22nd, 1974, no. 317, illus.)
A.N. Oikonomides, Chicago

But with very little in the way of documentation to confirm this narrative.

The object sold to an unidentified buyer for $92,500 USD.

In May 2017, the head of Alexander surfaced across the Atlantic.  This time the ancient marble head went up for sale in the United Kingdom, having once been in the possession of former Qatari culture minister and cousin of the current ruler of the oil-rich Arab country, Sheikh Saud bin Mohammed Ali Al-Thani.  Before his death in 2014 Sheikh Saud Al-Thani was believed to have been the world's richest art collector.

Through Classical Galleries Limited, UK the Sheikh’s foundation sold the head of Alexander to Alan Safani of Safani Gallery for $152,625 on June 20, 2017.

Object Identified

Safani Gallery Booth - TEFAF 2018
Image Credit: L. Albertson
By an amazing bit of serendipity, on 19 February 2018 Dr. Patrizia Fortini, Director and Coordinator of the Archaeological Site of the Roman Forum and Palatine Hill chanced upon an advertisement which featured a photo of the stolen head in a publication for the upcoming 2018 Fine Arts Expo known as TEFAF.  In the dealer's documentation, a photograph of the marble head had been included highlighting Safani Gallery's offerings for the upcoming Maastricht sale scheduled to be held in the Netherlands from March 10 through 18 in 2018.

The photo in the advertisement and the old archival documentation photo of the head in the Museo Forense’s cloister were identified as one and the same object and as a result, Italy moved forward in requesting the object's seizure.

For now Judge Broderick’s decision has recognised the primacy of state court jurisdiction in adjudicating disputes over the seizure of stolen antiquities. Leaving the ultimate question of who owns the Head to the state court, he observed:
“[a] finding that the Manhattan DA violated the Constitution by seizing the Head without probable cause and without due process would not change the fact that only the state court can order the disposition of the Head.”
For now, Safani has one month to appeal against Judge Broderick's final dismissal decision.  

To view the New York Application for Turnover in its entirety, please see here.
To view the New York February 22, 2018 Seizure Order, please see here.
To view the the US District Court's 28 January 2025 Dismissal Order, please see here.

By:  Lynda Albertson