Blog Subscription via Follow.it

Showing posts with label Hindman Auctions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hindman Auctions. Show all posts

March 29, 2025

Saturday, March 29, 2025 - ,,, No comments

Justice for Cambodia: Manhattan D.A. Repatriates Looted Artifacts

This week the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office announced the restitution of two two looted Cambodian sculptures, recovered as part of its ongoing investigation into global antiquities trafficking networks, including that of Subhash Kapoor, who is currently awaiting extradition from India to face charges in New York. 

A former Manhattan ancient art dealer who operated the gallery Art of the Past, Kapoor is at the center of one of the largest antiquities trafficking networks in history, orchestrating the looting and illegal sale of thousands of cultural artefacts from India, Cambodia, and other Southeast Asian countries. 

Operating under the guise of a legitimate antiquities dealer, Kapoor used his once-prestigious New York gallery to launder stolen artefacts many of which found their way into major museums and private collections worldwide. In India, he worked with temple looters and smugglers to steal sacred Hindu and Buddhist sculptures, many of which were violently removed from their original sites. Similarly, in Cambodia, Kapoor’s network targeted Khmer-era temples, plundering centuries-old statues and carvings that were then smuggled out of the country using falsified provenance documents.

Arrested in Germany on 30 October 2011 while on business to Cologne,  he was  extradited to India, where he remains in custody for his role in illicit activities tied to that source country, with U.S. authorities seek his extradition to face additional charges in New York. To date, investigations into his network have led to the recovery and repatriation of hundreds of looted artefacts, and has exposed the weaknesses in the ancient art market which were easily exploited.  

Cultural Significance of the Returned Artefacts

The first artefact, a Baphuon Period, (11th Century CE) Sandstone Torso, carved standing in samabhanga and wearing a high-waisted sampot, was excavated from the site of the ancient temple Prasat Bavel in northwestern Cambodia and was displayed at the Wat Po Veal Museum in 1965.  The statue is one of at least 68 statues dating from the 6th century to the post-Angkorian period that were stolen from Battambang Provincial Museum or the Wat Po Veal Museum in Battambang City during Cambodia's unrest and was stolen after being placed in protective storage by national authorities.

The Khmer artifact collection at the Wat Po Veal Museum was greatly damaged (with some artefacts looted) in the 1970s, as this early 1980s photo demonstrates. - Image Credit:CDCAM

The torso began circulating on the ancient art market in 1981 at Spink & Son, Ltd., a defunct London auction house that has frequently been linked to looted antiquities.  There it was acquired by a Chicago collector on 20 January 1982.   Once in the US, it remained in private hands for decades until it was placed up for sale by Freeman’s | Hindman auction in New York on 20 September 2024 as Lot 153, at which point the DANY-ATU swiftly intervened and seized the artefact.

The second artefact, a 12th-century Angkor-style Khmer Head of a Ruler, bears a fragmentary naga, a traditional symbol of royalty and divinity with a conical mukuta rising above a diadem carved in filigree design while a fragment of one heavy earring hangs from his right ear.  The sculpture, decapitated at the neck, is symbolic of so many sculptures, violently reduced to transportable moveable commodities by looters. The object was smuggled into the United States and funnelled through a network of dealers, including Kapoor and appraisers before coming to the attention of DANY's investigative team. 

The second artefact, a 12th-century Angkor-style Khmer Head of a Ruler, bears a fragmentary naga, a traditional symbol of royalty and divinity with a conical mukuta rising above a diadem carved in filigree design while a fragment of one heavy earring hangs from his right ear.  The sculpture, decapitated at the neck, is symbolic of so many sculptures, violently reduced to transportable moveable commodities by looters. The object was smuggled into the United States and funnelled through a network of dealers, including Kapoor and appraisers before coming to the attention of DANY's investigative team. 

Efforts to Repatriate Looted Heritage

The return of these sculptures highlights the close collaboration between U.S. authorities and the Cambodian government in reclaiming looted heritage. Ambassador Koy Kuong of Cambodia praised the effort, stating, “As we mark the 75th anniversary of Cambodia–U.S. diplomatic relations, this meaningful act reflects the strength of our enduring ties and our shared commitment to cultural preservation and justice.”

Assistant District Attorney Matthew Bogdanos, along with ADAs Jacqueline Studley and James Edwards-Lebair, led the investigations, supported by a team of investigative analysts and international experts. The efforts were further bolstered by the contributions of Cambodian officials and scholars from the University of Poitiers’ Celtrac Team.

The work of the ATU serves as a crucial reminder of the enduring impact of cultural theft and the importance of holding those responsible accountable. With Kapoor’s extradition still pending, the battle against illicit antiquities trafficking continues, but each successful repatriation marks another step toward justice and the restoration of global heritage.

For over a decade, the District Attorney’s Antiquities Trafficking Unit (ATU) has worked alongside international partners to investigate Kapoor and his co-conspirators for their alleged role in the illegal looting, exportation, and sale of artifacts from South and Southeast Asia. This extensive probe has resulted in the convictions of five individuals, with extradition proceedings pending for five more. In total, more than 30 artifacts have been repatriated to Cambodia in recent years, underscoring the ATU’s commitment to dismantling smuggling rings and restoring cultural property to its rightful home.

Investigative support for these returns was provided by Huot Samnang, Director of the Department of Antiquities, Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts, Cambodia; CelTrac (Cellule de recherche des trafics des biens culturels) at the Université de Poitiers; and Mélanie Theillet.

June 29, 2020

Monday, June 29, 2020 - ,,,,,,,, 4 comments

Object Alert: An Illicit antiquity breezes through the windy city

Hindman Auction Catalogue - 16 June 2020
Lot 157
Most of the time, when one thinks of illicit antiquities one imagines them transiting their way through lofty auction showrooms in London, New York, or more recently, as was in the news last week, Paris.  One doesn't usually suspect a homegrown auction house, from the windy city of Chicago, as a place to spot hot art that once passed through the hands of one of Italy's most notorious bad boys, art dealer Giacomo Medici.  But the market for looted or unprovenanced cultural property in America is still going strong and plundered artefacts have the tendency to scatter farther than you think.  Sometimes, when they do, they turn up in places that we don't expect, well, at least until we do.

An art dealer who post-sentence resides in an expansive seaside villa west of Rome, Giacomo Medici was convicted 13 December 2004 of participation in an organized criminal group as its principal promoter and organizer.  Men in his network plundered large swaths of Italy's territory, with the network's loot making its way into some of the world's most prestigious museums and lining the shelves of extravagant private collections.  But despite the sixteen years that have past since his conviction, Medici's ill-gotten wares continue to bubble to the surface, not unlike Italian gnocchi, one object at a time, in slow dribs and drabs and usually not even mentioning his name as was the case with this recent artefact.

This time, in late June, an investigation lead by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), in collaboration with the New York District Attorney's Office and the Carabinieri Command for the Protection of Cultural Heritage turned up another one of Giacomino's antiquities, this time at Chicago's very own, Hindman Auctioneers, a firm which merged in 2019 with Ohio-based Cowan's and shortened its name from Leslie Hindman to just plain Hindman. 

Photographed on pages 116 and 117 of Hindman's 16 June 2020 Antiquities and Islamic Art catalogue, Lot 15, A Roman Marble Torso of a Faun with a Goose lists the artefact's provenance succinctly: 

Private Collection. London, acquired in New York in the early 1990s 
Oliver Forge & Brendan Lynch. London, 2013

What was provided to back up this claim, or what import, export, or shipping documents were submitted to demonstrate that this Italian antiquity's passages into the United States previously, then back across the sea to the UK, then back into Chicago were legitimate, leaves me curious. 

With no difficulty, and without auction consignment profits to incentivise (or disincentivise) my due diligence, I was quickly, and without too much trouble, able to find and cross-reference the 2013 sale via the Forge & Lynch Antiquities - Including the Collection of Ernst Langlotz (1895-1978) catalogue.   This sales PDF documented the previous sale of the mythological half-human, half-goat, creature with a discreet tail in a two-page spread.

Oliver Forge and Brendan Lynch Ltd.,
Antiquities - Including the Collection of Ernst Langlotz (1895-1978) Catalogue - 2013

Joint proprietors of the art dealership Oliver Forge and Brendan Lynch Ltd., Forge and Lynch left Sotheby’s in London in 1997 when the auction house began winding down its London antiquities sales and continued working together for their own ancient art gallery formed in the UK in July 2000.  Both art dealers are familiar with the problem children antiquities dealers of yesteryear from their Sotheby's days, and both have continued to get their reputations scorched brokering suspect art via more recent problematic dealers like Subhash Kapoor. 

So even without Medici's name clearly printed on anything provenance-y provided by the Faun's consignor to Hindman, one has to question first where Forge & Lynch themselves got the piece, and secondly, their own provenance entry for the earlier sale of this artefact, which reads: 

Probably acquired in New York, early 1990s  
Private collection, London, early 1990s-2013

This entry leads me to ask why Hindman changed the "probably acquired in New York" to definitely acquired in New York.  It is also curious why Hindman left off the non-specific "Private collection" in London which at first shakes, might appear less problematic than Robin Symes, whose name appears elsewhere in the June catalogue for LOT 83 from this sale. 

Did someone at Hindman find paperwork that changed the Faun's purported New York acquisition from probable into definite?  And what about that private collection in London from the 1990s until 2013.  Wasn't that one line, even vaguely written, not naming names worth mentioning on the big empty space of the full-page advertisement for the sculpture?  So why did Hindman elect to omit this detail?  

My hunch is that Hindman, who voluntarily relinquished the sculpture of the Faun to the authorities once evidence was presented by law enforcement, operates under the assumption that the occasional confiscation of a found-to-be-looted antiquity identified in their sales catalogues is a reasonable cost of doing business in the murky world of ancient art.  

Risks Hindman has already proved willing to take in the past and that illicit antiquities researcher Christos Tsirogiannis, cooperating with HSI-ICE, pointed out in an earlier Hindman auction, published in the auction house's ‘Worldly Pursuits: An Adventurer’s Collection. The Estate of Steve and Peggy Fossett catalogue. In that sale, Tsirogiannis identified three antiquities which matched archival photos in the Medici and Symes archives which proved that the objects had once passed through, or been shared with the networks of Giacomo Medici, Robin Symes, and Christo Michaelides.

But let's go back to this month's Hindman, June 16th auction catalogue.  In this summer's sale, 127 objects out of 273 are listed without any provenance dates whatsoever.  Of the 146 remaining objects included in the catalogue which do list some date references:

15 show collection history dates which predate the UNESCO 1970s convention;
12 show collection history dates only to the 1970s;
85 show collection history dates only to the 1980s;
32 show collection history dates only to the 1990s;
and 2 only go back as far as the 2000s.

 Knowing that illicit trafficking eyes cannot monitor every single sale, or inquire about every single object consigned to every auction house around the world, leaving out provenance details creates an environment conducive for a game of risk, with dealers more than willing to play, chalking up any losses from the occasional identified object after it has been illegally exported, as inventory shrinkage.

By limiting the details of what is written in provenance descriptions for objects being sold, dealers and auction houses create intentional impediments to those who try to research an object's legitimacy, making it more difficult to discern when an antiquity has passed through the hands of suspect dealers and when a legitimate object has simply been badly documented by a previous owner careless with their receipts.  And that's just speaking to those interested enough, and with the time to dedicate to actually monitor the previous sales of ancient artefacts.

According to a new report published to the LiveAuctioneers website, this inaugural Hindman ancient art auction brought in nearly $1M in sales, proving once again, that despite all the academics screaming about the necessity for clean provenance, buyers of ancient art, for the most part, are not unduly curious about the collection histories of their potential ancient art purchases.  Likewise, more collectors continue to be oblivious or disengaged as to whether or not the antiquities market is problematic and whether or not their lack of curiosity, and lack of due diligence before buying, acts as a catalyst for the destruction of archaeological sites in the Mediterranean world.

Should Hindman have known better with this artefact and should they have been more forthcoming with all of the collection histories listed for this $1M sale's catalogue? Yes and yes.

Hindman Auctioneers was founded by Leslie Hindman in Chicago in 1982.  The firm was not born yesterday, therefore they should be aware of the problems of illicit material infiltrating the ancient art market.  Thomas Galbraith who took over from Leslie Hindman as CEO of the company she founded, (she remains on the board) previously worked as Artnet’s director of global strategy and as interim CEO for Google Venture's start-up Twyla, an online sales platform for art, meaning they both are experienced in art world sales. Given the people at Hindman's helm, and the company's sales presence on the Live Auctioneers sales portal, it also stands to reason that the Chicago auction house has employees with sufficient technical abilities and talent to Google the legitimacy of the objects they accept on consignment and the names of dealers which are problematic.  Given that neither Galbraith nor Hindman are new to the problems of the world, one can assume that their lack of transparency when it comes to collection publishing collection histories for the objects they auction is a conscious choice.

But despite all this, the windy city seems to be gaining ground in the art market. Phillips and Bonhams, both based in London, having opened there, alongside already existing Christie's, and Sotheby's, to keep Hindman company. And browsing through the names of important London and New York ancient art dealers like Charles Ede Ltd., and Royal Athena Galleries whose's pieces were selling in this June's Hindman catalogue, it seems apropos to remind collectors of ancient art (once again) of the need to open their eyes and ask for proof of legitimacy, before simply forking over cash for what might turn out to be tomorrow's new seizure. 

By:  Lynda Albertson

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)