Blog Subscription via Follow.it

Showing posts with label illicit trafficking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label illicit trafficking. Show all posts

November 3, 2025

From Cairo to Barcelona to The Hague: How One Dealer’s Footprint Lingers in Repatriation Cases

TEFAF Maastricht 2022
Image Credit: ARCA

On 15 April 2024 and 19 April 2024, ARCA published two articles building on an announcement made by Spain's Ministry of the Interior which involved the identification of a looted Egyptian object. That investigation involved the Policía Nacional's Historical Heritage Brigade in collaboration with the Dutch Politie, the expertise of an extremely knowledgeable forensic scholar, and the assistance of a cooperating art gallery. With their combined efforts, the Swiss dealer voluntarily relinquished the suspect antiquity to the Dutch police.

Yesterday, Caretaker Prime Minister Dick Schoof, in a meeting with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, announced that the Netherlands will hand over that same stolen sculpture by the end of the year.

Too frequently, antiquities restitution reporting becomes formulaic, providing only cursory information on an object's country of origin, value, age, and the agencies responsible for its seizure or restitution. This happened once again in this case, where one Dutch article reduced the historic object to its most basic description, “a 3,500-year-old stone head from the dynasty of Pharaoh Thutmose III,” followed by a brief paragraph speculating that the piece might be put on display at Egypt's the Grand Egyptian Museum in Cairo, which officially opened yesterday.

Basic shapes of block statues
In this kind of reportage, the significance of the artefact takes second place to the spectacle of international cultural diplomacy. We miss the opportunity to emphasise that, despite regulations, investigations, and cooperating dealers, illicit antiquities continue to enter the licit ancient art market, and that it can take years, in this case from 2020 to 2025, to correct the wrongs involved in their circulation.

ARCA, being a research-based organisation which specifically examines  crimes that impact art and artefacts, does its best to provide more details to problematic pieces and the problematic dealers that profit from them. Our reporting serves as a means of holding people accountable and reminding individuals of the need to collect responsibly. 

The artefact being returned is not just an Egyptian "head".  It is a decapitated head broken off of an 18th Dynasty Egyptian block statue that was likely intentionally hacked off its body, or deliberately broken at the shoulders for ease of smuggling. Had it been intact, this memorial statue would have shown a man crouched and wrapped in a cloak, inscribed, at the very least with the name of the owner, incised on the body, the base, or the back pillar if one existed. 

Our original reporting touched on what we were able to ascertain about this disembodied head of a squatting man. We knew he was documented on social media sites and came up for sale through a Swiss-based art dealer during the short-lived European Fine Art Fair in 2020 and again with this same dealer when the fair reopened post-Covid in 2022.  Having been the subject of a joint-European policing initiative we know that authorities were convinced he was illegally exported from Egypt in contravention of the country's cultural property laws, then transited through intermediaries in Thailand before being first put up for sale in Barcelona, where it was sold by controversial gallery owner, Jaume Bagot Peix, of J. Bagot Arqueología.

As early as 2015 Bagot's problematic purchasing had placed him on the radar of Policía Judicial y de la UCIE de la Comisaría General de Información.  In 2018, he and Oriol Carreras Palomar were formally charged for their alleged participation in a crime of financing terrorism, belonging to a criminal organisation, concealment of contraband, and use of forgery for their roles in facilitating the sale of illicit antiquities involving pieces trafficked from a second war torn country, Libya.  

Bagot also was charged, and subsequently convicted in Italy, related to a stolen Roman statue and has been linked to a stolen Egyptian ushabti from Sudan, which was again circulated on the art market with falsified provenance documentation. That artefact was sold to the Rijksmuseum van Oudheden in the Netherlands.  

But despite being suspected of trafficking material from at least three war-torn countries, and having one conviction in mainland Europe while other cases in other jurisdictions pile up, Bagot continues to receive favourable coverage in the press and has been described as operating "one of the most renowned ancient art galleries in Spain."  He also continues to be granted booths and promotion by Spain's Feriarte, an important annual art fair held at IFEMA Madrid, most recently from 18 to 26 October 2025, as well as at ANTIK Almoneda, another Madrid art sales event held from 22 to 30 March 2025.


All this demonstrates how long justice can take. In this Dutch restitution, it will have required five years from this objects initial sighting and identification at TEFAF in 2020 until its ultimate return to Egypt later this year and even longer for these problematic Spanish dealers to face the consequences of their actions. This case, like a second Bagot-related case in Belgium involving the the recent restitution of the Egyptian coffin of Pa-di-Hor-pa-khered, which was stolen from an archaeological site in Egypt in December 2015 and restituted in July 2025 both serve as reminders that restitution is not simply a bureaucratic exercise; it is a fight against a global market that too often rewards negligence and turns a blind eye to complicity. 

Until the art trade adopts a genuine commitment to better behaviour, transparency and due diligence, and holds its art market actors accountable, the cycle of loss, recovery, protracted restitution, and delayed accountability will continue, slowly, one object at a time.

October 21, 2025

Train with ARCA in the World’s Longest-Running Programme in Art Crime and Cultural Heritage Protection


The Association for Research into Crimes against Art is thrilled to announce that applications are now open for its 2026 Postgraduate Certificate Programmes in the study of art crime and cultural heritage protection, two multi-course sessions designed for those passionate about protecting the world’s art and heritage. These programmes unite museum professionals, scholars, lawyers, and students from around the globe to explore the complex realities of art theft, looting, forgery, and illicit trafficking—and the legal, ethical, and cultural frameworks that define this field.

From 22 May–23 June 2026, Post Lauream I: Art and Antiquities Crime offers a deep dive into the mechanisms of the illicit art market, the networks that sustain it, and the global efforts to combat it. From 26 June–26 July 2026, Post Lauream II: Provenance, Acquisition & Interpretation of Cultural Property examines how ownership histories, museum ethics, and repatriation debates shape cultural stewardship today. Both programmes are held in Italy, offering immersive, hands-on study in a setting rich with art, history, and community.

When ARCA first launched its interdisciplinary summer programme in 2009, it broke new ground—becoming the first of its kind to address the urgent need for specialised training in art-crime prevention and cultural-heritage protection. Since then, alumni from 43 countries have joined a growing network of professionals working in museums, law enforcement, academia, and the art market.

Recent high-profile museum thefts—from the Louvre to others which attacks at  collections across Europe and the UK—remind us why this advanced training matters. Understanding art crime isn’t only about investigating stolen objects; it’s about tracing the systems that allow these crimes to occur and learning how to intervene ethically, legally, and effectively. ARCA’s programmes equip participants with the critical insight to navigate this world and the practical tools to make meaningful change.


Why You Should Consider Applying
  1. Two Distinct Programmes—One Comprehensive Field: Choose between two certificate tracks, or combine them for a full-spectrum education in art-crime investigation, provenance research, and cultural-property ethics.
  2. Expert-Led Instruction: Learn directly from internationally recognised specialists who actively work in the sector—from police investigators and cultural-property lawyers to museum professionals and scholars.
  3. Immersive, Real-World Training: Experience an intensive, interdisciplinary curriculum combining criminology, law, art history, and heritage preservation.
  4. Global Community: Join a dynamic network of alumni making an impact across the art world, cultural institutions, and law-enforcement agencies.

Protecting cultural heritage is not just a career path—it’s a calling. If you’re ready to deepen your expertise and help safeguard the world’s shared treasures, we invite you to apply.

To request the 2026 prospectus and application materials for Post Lauream I & II, please visit www.artcrimeresearch.org or email us at:  

programmes (at) artcrimeresearch.org

June 27, 2025

Regulating the Past: The EU’s Cultural Goods Import Controls Enter into Force June 2025


Tomorrow, 28 June 2025, marks the official implementation date of Regulation (EU) 2019/880 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the introduction and the import of cultural goods.  This regulation aims to combat the illicit trafficking of cultural goods into the European Union — especially in the context of terrorism financing and organised crime and establishes a strict framework to prevent the import of cultural goods of illicit origin into the EU. 

This Regulation applies only to cultural goods created or discovered outside of the European Union.

The regulation was introduced in response to:

  • Increasing international concerns about looted antiquities (particularly from conflict zones like Syria, Iraq*),
  • The use of cultural objects to fund terrorism,
  • The lack of uniform rules across EU Member States regarding the import of cultural goods.
Important Requirements 

1. Import Licences

  • Required for archaeological objects, parts of monuments, and other high-risk items over 250 years of age.

  • Importers must present documentation proving the goods were legally exported from the country of origin (source country)

2. Importer Statements:

  • For other categories of cultural goods  (e.g. art objects >200 years old and >€18,000) , importers must sign a declaration stating the items were lawfully exported, accompanied by supporting documentation.

3. Centralised electronic system (ICG):

  • The EU will also begin using a centralised electronic system (ICG) to ensure transparency, traceability and effective controls.

Regulation Impact

This regulation introduces a harmonised legal framework across all EU Member States, designed to prevent the European art market from serving as a conduit for illicit antiquities. Widely welcomed by researchers and advocates working to combat the trafficking of cultural property, it nonetheless raises significant concerns among art dealers and auction houses, who caution that the new measures could impose complex and burdensome compliance requirements on legitimate trade.

While the regulation presents clear challenges—not only for market operators but also for customs officials and cultural authorities—it also offers a critical opportunity: to enhance cross-border cooperation, reinforce legal standards, and foster greater transparency and accountability in the international art market.

Whether you work in cultural heritage protection, law enforcement, customs, the legal sector, or international cooperation—now is the time to stay informed, engaged, and prepared.

----------

* Specific EU regulations have been implemented to provide special protection for cultural goods from conflict zones in the Iraq war (Council Regulation (EU) No 1210/2003) and the Syrian war (Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012).



April 16, 2025

Sudan’s Cultural Heart Under Threat: The Fate of the Sudan National Museum Amid Civil Conflict


In the heart of Khartoum, nestled near the confluence of the Blue and White Nile, stands the Sudan National Museum—once a vital repository to centuries of knowledge regarding country's ancient and storied past.  Home to the world’s most comprehensive collection of Nubian archaeology, the museum has long served as both a guardian of Sudan’s rich cultural heritage and a symbol of national identity. 

When violence first broke out in April 2023 between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), Khartoum became an epicenter of combat. Within days, RSF units occupied large swaths of the city, including key government buildings, residential neighbourhoods, and the area surrounding the Sudan National Museum. 

The museum itself fell within contested territory, with ongoing shelling and street battles posing severe risk and making its interior impossible to secure.  Throughout the months that followed, reports of looting and damage to Khartoum’s infrastructure and the museum were reported, with its museum staff and heritage experts displaced under the strain of war, making it nearly impossible to assess the damage while the the city remained under siege. 

It wasn’t until early 2025—after a sustained counteroffensive by the SAF and international diplomatic pressure—that much of central Khartoum, including the museum district, was recaptured. By then, however, the damage to Sudan's important cultural landmarks had already been done.

A Repository of Nubian Glory

The Sudan National Museum was established in 1971 and housed over 50,000 years of human history. Its galleries showcased everything from prehistoric stone tools and ancient Christian frescoes to monumental statues and pharaonic temples rescued from the waters of Lake Nasser during the UNESCO Nubia Campaign of the 1960s. The museum's collection includes artifacts from the Kingdom of Kush, the Kerma civilisation, and the Christian kingdoms of Nubia, shedding light on cultures often overshadowed by their northern neighbours in Egypt.

What made the museum especially significant was not just the artefacts it held, but the unique narrative it wove—a story of African ingenuity, political power, and religious transformation that challenged long-standing historical biases and centered Sudan within the broader tapestry of global heritage which transcended its modern day, and often contested borders.

Cultural Institutions in the Crossfire

Since the outbreak of conflict, the museum—like many institutions in the country—suffered from a lack of security, interrupted funding, and the physical dangers posed by armed clashes waged in and around it.  By early 2024, satellite images and reports from heritage professionals warned of structural damage to the museum's building and the increasing vulnerability of its collections to looting and environmental degradation.  

As the war raged on, nearly all archaeological research was suspended in the country and most conservation projects ceased. 

In September 2004, two hundred Sudanese researchers called on South Sudan President Salva Kiir Mayardit to help recover valuable artefacts believed to have been looted from the National Museum in Khartoum, and thought by some to have been routed through South Sudan as a transit country for resale on the black market. 

Buhen temple at the grounds of Sudan National Museum in Khartoum before conflict

Outside of Khartoum, heritage sites like the pyramids of Meroë, the ruins of Dongola, and the ancient city of Naga face their own perils, ranging from looting to neglect, as tourism halted and protective oversight became more and more precarious.  In many cases, local communities that once partnered with archaeologists to steward these sites, were forced to focus on survival amid conflict and displacement.

Current Situation

The first awful photos ARCA has seen of the devastated Sudan National Museum show one small glimmer of hope that at least the Buhen Dynasty temple, on the grounds of the museum, appears to be mostly intact.  Built by Hatshepsut, daughter of Thutmose I (1473-1458 BCE), the temple is dedicated to Horus and once stood at the fortress of Buhan.  It was moved to Khartoum, when its find spot was covered by the resulting Lake Nasser, created by the Aswan Dam project in 1964.

The damage inside the museum and in its labs is more painful and the destruction and looting of pieces in the collection are still under assessment.  The Director of Museums at the National Corporation for Antiquities and Chair of the Sudanese Antiquities Repatriation Committee, Ikhlas Abdel Latif has stated that all the artefacts from the Gold Room, one of the rarest museum collections from the Kushite Empire, were systematically stolen, and many of the museum's other artefacts were also destroyed.


Outside, unexploded projectiles can be found embedded in the stone and will need to be removed carefully by explosive experts. 

In the Aftermath

The current situation in Sudan is critical, and serves as a painful reminder of the fragility of cultural heritage during times of conflict, as well as the fact that the human impact of devastation and war often supersedes and takes priority over heritage impact.  

That said, the loss of collections within the Sudan National Museum and its other heritage institutions and archaeological sites should not be under-recognised. The museum did more than simply display artefacts—it anchored identity, inspired pride, and offered future generations a connection to their roots. 

Losses such as those being recorded now, are and will continue to be a national tragedy, as well as a global one, long after the conflict subsides.

King Atlanersa (also Atlanarsa), Kushite ruler of the Napatan kingdom of Nubia
(Reign c. 653–643 BCE) 

In the meantime, digital preservation efforts, diaspora scholarship, and international partnerships are called upon to help safeguard what could not be protected from afar. The world must not turn away. The ruins of Nubia tell a story that spans millennia and whether or not that story continues depends not just on the past—but on how we choose to protect it today.

March 11, 2025

Forensic Archaeologist Dr. Samer Abdel Ghafour is teaching with ARCA again this summer

 


Can you give us an introduction about yourself?

I’m honoured to be part of this interview and to share my journey in cultural heritage protection and the fight against the illicit trafficking of antiquities.  My background combines extensive experience in cultural heritage preservation with a strong focus on safeguarding archaeological sites and cultural assets in conflict zones.  Early in my career, I worked at the National Archaeological Museum of Aleppo and later at the Syrian Directorate-General for Antiquities and Museums (DGAM), where I engaged in efforts to protect heritage under various circumstances.

Over the years, I’ve collaborated with international organisations, including UNESCO, Europol, and the British Museum, as well as with law enforcement agencies on projects with the Italian Carabinieri TPC, and the Dutch National Police.  I also founded ArchaeologyIN, a social media network aimed at promoting cultural heritage awareness across ten countries.  This work remains close to my heart, particularly as we confront ongoing challenges to cultural heritage in the Middle East and North Africa region.

From Aleppo to Europe is quite a journey, can you tell us about that?

My journey into the world of cultural heritage protection began at the National Archaeological Museum of Aleppo.  I was fortunate to work at one of the region’s oldest and most prestigious institutions, which fuelled my passion for preserving Syria’s rich heritage.  My early days were filled with fieldwork, cataloguing artefacts, and collaborating with teams dedicated to archaeological research and preservation.  Later, I joined the Syrian Directorate-General for Antiquities and Museums in Damascus, where my knowledge and experience in project management and international cooperation increased.

With the outbreak of conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa region and in response to the emergence of new challenges, I launched ArchaeologyIN, a platform designed to raise public awareness about the importance of cultural heritage.  Over time, my work extended beyond Syria to encompass the broader MENA region.  My research and collaborations have focused on mitigating the risks to cultural assets in conflict zones, working with global institutions such as UNESCO and ARCA.  Each step of this journey has deepened my understanding of the complex network behind the illicit antiquities trade and strengthened my resolve to protect what remains.

How did you get involved with ARCA?

My connection with ARCA started through a shared passion for combatting art crime and protecting cultural heritage.  I first learned about ARCA’s work through its extensive publications and network of experts.  When I attended their postgraduate program as a Minerva scholar ten years ago, it became clear that this was more than an academic experience—it was a community of professionals committed to making a difference.  The program’s unique approach to blending practical case studies with cutting-edge research inspired me to stay involved.  I was later invited to join as a lecturer, an opportunity I gladly accepted.  Teaching at ARCA allows me to engage with dedicated professionals and students who share a passion for protecting cultural heritage and disrupting the networks that traffic antiquities.

Can you tell us about the purpose of the your course?

This summer, I’ll be teaching Unravelling the Hidden Market of Illicit Antiquities, a course that offers participants a deep dive into the international trafficking of antiquities. We’ll explore case studies from the past 50 to 60 years, focusing on how the trade has evolved.

The course is designed to be both informative and interactive. We’ll begin with a historical overview of the illicit trade, then move on to key players in the market, from prominent dealers to auction houses, museums, and galleries. We’ll uncover the intricate network behind this shadowy trade by examining the roles of source, transit, and market countries.  Our sessions will include practical discussions on the legal and ethical challenges of repatriation and the level of proof required to secure a successful claim.

Participants can expect a mix of lectures and interactive discussions, giving them the tools to better understand and confront this global issue.

Tell us life when you are in Amelia

Amelia is a hidden gem in the heart of Umbria, Italy.  Nestled atop a hill, this charming medieval town offers a serene escape from the hustle and bustle of modern life.  Narrow cobblestone streets wind through centuries-old buildings, leading to stunning views of the surrounding countryside.  Life in Amelia is peaceful yet vibrant, with a rich cultural history, making it the perfect setting for ARCA’s program.

For participants, Amelia becomes more than just a backdrop—it’s a place to immerse yourself in Italian culture, connect with fellow professionals, and reflect on the importance of preserving our shared heritage.

Can you tell us what makes ARCA's programmes special?

One of the most unique aspects of ARCA’s program is its emphasis on blending theoretical knowledge with real-world application.  Participants gain not only a deep understanding of the international art and antiquities crime landscape but also access to an extraordinary network of professionals.  This program creates an environment where scholars, law enforcement professionals, and cultural heritage experts from around the world come together to share insights and collaborate on solutions to some of the most pressing challenges in the field.

A highlight of the summer is The Amelia Conference – 2025, ARCA’s Annual Interdisciplinary Art Crime Conference, which will take place from June 20 to 22, 2025.  This conference is a rare opportunity for program participants to meet and engage with a wide range of experts in art crime and cultural heritage protection.  The conference offers participants the chance to learn from leading voices in the field, expand their professional networks, and gain practical insights that complement their studies.

By the time participants complete the program, they’re not only better equipped to address the complexities of art crime—they’re also part of a vibrant, global community dedicated to protecting cultural heritage.

If you could follow another professor's course, which one would it be? 

If I had the chance to take a course at ARCA, it would likely be “Discarded, Discovered, Collected: The Ethics of Antiquities Preservation and Publication” by Roberta Mazza.  This course offers invaluable insights into why are antiquities exchanged on the market and what drives price formation? It also covers grouond on what is special about antiquities with texts inscribed on them, and the sometimes vulnerable relationships between academics and actors in the art market who deal in this type of textual remains.

Do you have any advice for applicants and participants?

My advice for new participants is simple: embrace every opportunity this program offers.  Be curious, ask questions, and engage with the community.  The beauty of this program lies in its diversity—everyone brings a unique perspective to the table.

Also, take the time to explore Amelia and immerse yourself in its history and culture.  These experiences will enrich your understanding of cultural heritage in ways that go beyond the classroom.  Most importantly, remember that what you’re learning here has real-world implications. You’re joining a global effort to protect our shared history—an effort that is more important now than ever.

By Edgar Tijhuis

October 28, 2024

Protecting the Past, Shaping the Future: ARCA’s Two 2025 Postgraduate Certificate Programmes in Art Crime and Cultural Heritage


In 2025, ARCA is breaking new ground by offering not one, but two Postgraduate Certificate Programmes in art crime and cultural heritage. When ARCA launched its original interdisciplinary programme in 2009, it was the first of its kind, addressing the urgent need to train professionals in understanding the hidden networks and illicit activities within the art world.  Through an intensive, hands-on approach, ARCA’s summer program has since trained individuals from forty-two countries in tackling and exploring the complexities of art crime and cultural heritage preservation. 

If you've been keeping an eye on recent news, you're aware that incidents like museum thefts, forgeries, looting, and the illicit trade of cultural goods are far from isolated. These crimes contribute to a larger web of criminal activity that includes intentional destruction and plunder of cultural heritage during and after conflicts, incidences known to fuel instability in regions worldwide.

Despite the clear threat, many galleries, auction houses, and museums still struggle to vet acquisitions to problematic material, leading to lengthy and ongoing challenges regarding the provenance and ethical acquisition of material.  ARCA’s programmes give trainees the skills to recognise and confront these issues head-on, looking at the big picture of art crime across borders, time periods, and legal systems to see just how profoundly these issues impact global cultural heritage.

This legacy is more than history—it’s a shared treasure, one that defines and connects us all. Protecting it is essential to preserving our cultural future. ARCA’s programs, still the longest-running and most comprehensive of their kind, have equipped countless professionals with the tools to do just that.

Here are five reasons to apply to one (or both!) of our Post Lauream Certifications in: 

Art and Antiquities Crime 
and 
Acquisition & Interpretation of Cultural Property:
  1. Unique Dual-Program Offering: 2025 marks the first year you can choose between two unique tracks—or combine them for a comprehensive education covering all facets of art crime and cultural heritage protection and receive two certifications in one summer.

  2. Expert-Led Instruction: Learn directly from field-leading experts and practitioners whose real-world experience will give you a critical understanding of the art world’s complexities and the dark side that threatens it. ARCA's lecturers are international thought-leaders on the topic of art crime who actively work directly in this sector. 

  3. Practical, Real-World Training: Go beyond traditional studies with an interdisciplinary approach that brings together criminology, art history, law, and cultural preservation for a complete understanding of this global issue. ARCA’s immersive summer format delivers hands-on learning, allows you to engage deeply with the subject, practicing skills in real-world contexts that mirror the challenges faced by today’s professionals.

  4. Interdisciplinary InsightsEach course in each programme integrates multiple disciplines, offering perspectives that connect the dots between criminal motives, legal issues, and the protection of cultural heritage.

  5. Join a Global Network of Alumni and Professionals: Graduates of ARCA’s program are making waves in cultural institutions, law enforcement, museums, and legal spheres worldwide, and you’ll join a supportive network dedicated to combating art crime.

Protecting cultural heritage is an urgent and rewarding calling—why not apply to join us in changing the status quo.  For more information please see ARCA's website here.

To request further information on ARCA's Post Lauream I & II in Art and Antiquities Crime and the Acquisition & Interpretation of Cultural Property or to receive the 2026 prospectus and application materials, please email us at:

programmes (at) artcrimeresearch.org

April 19, 2024

Spain's antiquities dealer arrest and the importance of facts-based reporting

TEFAF Maastricht 2022
Image Credit: ARCA

Earlier this week, ARCA published an article building on an announcement made by Spain's Ministry of the Interior which involved the identification of a looted Egyptian object.  This investigation involved the Policía Nacional in collaboration with the Dutch Politie, and the expertise of forensic scholars, as well as the assistance of cooperating dealers and the support of art fair personnel.  These combined efforts resulted in the voluntary handover of the trafficked artefact in the Netherlands, and later, the reported arrest of a Barcelona-based ancient art dealer who, although unnamed by the authorities, was stated to have been charged with money laundering, smuggling, and document falsification.  

ARCA's article touched on its own research into the circulation of this suspect antiquity and to the object's identified Spanish handler.  In it, I named the dealer whom I (too) had ascertained as having been in possession of this piece after it arrived to Spain from Bangkok before being sold onward to other ancient art dealers in Germany and Switzerland.  

Shortly following the Spanish announcement, the bulk of the reporting by mainstream media covered this investigation by simply regurgitating the Spanish  government's official press release.  ARCA, being a research-based organisation which specifically examines (and sometimes reports on) forensic crimes that impact art and artefacts, opted to provide more detail.  To do so we discussed both the object itself and named its first seller, while also ensuring that in doing so we haven't compromised the work of international police forces.

Too frequently, trafficked artefact reporting becomes routinely formulaic, giving readers cursory information on an object's country of origin, value, age, and the names of involved agencies responsible for that object's recovery.  In this type of reportage, the artefacts themselves take second stage, often reduced to photo opportunities, where they are frequently overshadowed by fancy diplomatic handshakes. Whereas the story of the piece itself, its trafficking journey, its good faith and bad faith handlers and its place in history are often unconsidered, or left to vague statements and assumptions, much in the same way, archaeologists and art historians lament the loss of context when an artefact is extracted from its find spot and the object's history is lost during a clandestine excavation.  

Basic shapes of block statues

Likewise, when describing this partial 18th Dynasty Egyptian block statue most of the published news articles reduced the artefact to its period of creation, i.e., "a stolen Egyptian sculpture dated from 1450 BCE" or spoke to its rudimentary aesthetic characteristic, referring to the piece as simply as "an Egyptian head".  Smuggled clandestinely, often over great distances and hidden in shipments through multiple transit countries, by the time such looted antiquities appear on the ancient art market, where they are displayed in glittering European art galleries and art fairs, the pieces are no longer intact.  

In this case, the less informed buyer, might appreciate this sculpture's beautiful depiction of the head of an Egyptian male.  I, on the other hand, see its decapitated form as evidence of a crime scene.  I question whether or not this anonymous severed head, had likely been hacked off its body, or deliberately broken at the shoulders for ease of transport and smuggling, knowing that unfortunately this once complete representation of a man, is now absent the rest of his body.  

During Egypt's Eighteenth Dynasty, the artisan who sculpted this black-granite representation of a once-living human would have worked the hard stone with care and precision.  The focus of his efforts would have been to respectfully express the belief that the deceased person's Ka, his eternal life force, when separated from his earthly body at death, would be travelling between the worlds of the living and the dead and would need to find his eternal home inside this single memorial block statue, created expressly for this purpose.  Carved to represent the likeness of the deceased and placed inside a sanctuary, had this head remained with the rest of its body, we might also have learned, through inscriptions, the name of the esteemed person the sculptor sought to portray when he had creating this memorial artwork.  

But why the need for a second article? 

Over the past several days there has been scattered chatter via various social media sites where the veracity of my statements regarding who the arrested Spanish dealer was have been the subject of discussion.  

Art News journalist Karen Ho, doing her best to report the news and remain impartial to the contentious subject, wrote: 

...the Association for Research into Crimes Against Art, has claimed in a blog post that the individual in question is Jaume Bagot Peix, operator of the J. Bagot Arqueología gallery in Barcelona, Spain.

Art lawyer Justine Philippart, when pointed to ARCA's original blog article, stated on LinkedIn:

This article is fake news. Nothing is true. Thus, for example, Mr. Bagot was not arrested.


Art and cultural property lawyer Yves-Bernard Debie, who states his Brussels firm represented Bagot and his gallery, wrote in the Art News article: “We can confirm that our client has not been arrested. The information that is being disclosed is false.”

So let's start with things that we can assume are indisputable.
 
Spain's Ministry of the Interior stated that agents of the National Police have arrested an antiques seller in Barcelona for the head of the Block statue, which they indicated had been on display with a Swiss dealer at The European Fine Art Fair (TEFAF) although they did not specify in what year.  The ministry also stated that the investigations made it possible to prove that this artefact had been acquired in July 2015 by the person in charge of a (unnamed) Barcelona establishment after transiting through an international company based in Bangkok and that this gallery owner "knew of the illicit origin of the Egyptian piece" and had "justified the origin of the piece by providing a document that collected information on several archaeological pieces belonging to a Spanish collection." 

Now on to what I assessed before naming Jaume Bagot in my last article, and whether or not that information is false or fake news as claimed by the two lawyers.

To trace this artefact's progression through the art market I started by looking for, and analysing, any photographic evidence I could find that depicted this object in circulation.  Its passage with the Swiss dealer being the easiest part. I was able to  review photos taken by ARCA researchers while this piece had been on display at the dealer's TEFAF stand during events held at the Maastricht Exhibition & Conference Centre in March 2020, and again in June 2022.  Both of these photos were included in my previous blog post, one of which even had the date/time/street location for the MECC watermarked on the front. 

Both photos clearly demonstrate that this artefact was on display during the fair's operational hours and had not been "removed before its opening" in 2022 as was incorrectly stated in the Art News article.  Today, TEFAF provided me with clarification that the artefact had been removed, from sale, while the Dutch portion of the investigation was underway, but that the object had been allowed to remain on display to the public for the duration of the fair with the consent of the Dutch police while their investigation got underway. 

In addition to ARCA's own photos, I also scanned open source records looking for other depictions this object, finding photographic evidence which placed the artefact with the Swiss art gallery at least as early as 3 October 2018.  I then repeated similar exercises of date range-search-find-analyse in order to find photographic evidence which might confirm the identities of the German and Spanish dealers.  This process of elimination, helped to further narrow down the range of dates when this object was in the possession of the named Barcelona dealer. 

Narrowing down my search to whose photos to review first, to limit the number of photos I needed to sift through was easy.  I started with the only Barcelona-based ancient art dealer who had been publicly-mentioned as having connections to smuggled conflict and post-conflict country artefacts from the MENA region, some of which transited through intermediaries in Thailand. That person being Jaume Bagot Peix.  

Given that Bagot also had a standing conviction in Italy, related to a stolen antiquity and is currently alleged to have sold a stolen Egyptian artefact ushabti from Sudan with falsified provenance documentation to the Rijksmuseum van Oudheden in the Netherlands, I felt that reviewing the Egyptian material he may have sold after the July 2015 arrival date mentioned in the Ministry of the Interior's announcement might help to confirm whether or not he was the unnamed Barcelona dealer. 

Working with that hypothosis, I was able to locate and document this object in Bagot's possession through a series of photographs, as well as one video.  All depict the Egyptian head on display and for sale with J. Bagot Arqueología during the 37th edition of the Feriarte.  This art fair was held from November 21 to 29, 2015 in Madrid, roughly four months after law enforcement officers defined the object's entry into the EU from Bangkok.  To be fair, I have not added proof of these evidentiary images to this article, but simply forwarded each of my findings to the Spanish and Dutch Law enforcement officers working on this case.   

In closing I will state that as a routine act of due diligence, ARCA makes every effort to identify the circulation specifics of illicit artefacts discovered in circulation, in order to ensure their proper documentation.  This holds true for artefacts which have been seized by law enforcement agencies as the result of court orders, as well as those which have been voluntarily relinquished. Doing so helps us to map less-than-careful art market actors, as well as culpable ones.  

ARCA does not condone "fake news". Nor do we contribute to it.  Cultural property crimes are insidiously complex and as the old adage goes, when dealing with suspect material and the naming of problematic actors who handle said material, the devil is in the details which can be proven beyond dispute, even more so when that evidence is considered probative at trial.

By: Lynda Albertson

April 15, 2024

Arrest made in Spain on Egyptian antiquities smuggling case.

TEFAF Maastricht 2020
Image Credit: ARCA

According to Spain's Ministry of the Interior, following an investigation begun in 2023, the Policía Nacional have arrested a Barcelona gallery owner (Jaume Bagot Peix, operator of J. Bagot Arqueología) for allegedly committing the crimes of money laundering, smuggling, and document falsification in relation to this black granite head of a funerary monument for a high ranking official from the reign of Hatshepsut or Tuthmosis III in Egypt. 

TEFAF Maastricht 2022
Image Credit: ARCA

Valued at 190,000 euros, the circa 1504-1450 BCE artefact had been acquired by the Barcelona ancient art dealer in July 2015 via an intermediary in Bangkok, Thailand.  ARCA notes that this partial statue was documented on social media sites and up for sale through a Swiss-based art dealer during the short-lived European Fine Art Fair in 2020 and again with this same dealer when the fair reopened post-Covid in 2022.  

Having been the subject of a joint-European policing initiative which resulted in law enforcement authorities with the Dutch Politie in the Netherlands sharing evidence with their Spanish counterparts, police in Spain were able to concretised that this Egyptian artefact was illicit, despite it having been in free circulation for seven years through several sales passages occurring via dealers in Spain, Germany, and Switzerland.  Prior to these transactions, the object had traveled though the transit county of Thailand via an intermediary in Bangkok. 

The 18th Dynasty head depicts its patron wearing a short wig revealing the ears as well as defined almond-shaped eyes and prominent eyebrows.  In its complete and original form, the head would have once been attached at the shoulders to the rest of its memorial block statue representing a seated non-royal person.  

These types of statues would have depicted the individual's head, hands, and feet emerging from a cloak drawn tightly around the subject's body, similar to the one depicted at the left, which is on display at the Brooklyn Museum in New York.  During the period of the trafficked head's creation, it was likely crafted to resemble a guardian seated in the gateway of a temple as Egyptians believed that after a person's death, their soul could inhabit a statue in a general context of solar beliefs. 

The Swiss gallery that had purchased the artwork via another ancient art dealer in Germany, freely relinquished the artefact to the Dutch authorities once it was determined that the piece was suspect and had been acquired via the Spanish gallery owner, who had already been linked to the illicit trade in antiquities in conflict zones such as North Africa and the Middle East. 

To circulate this illicit artefact, the Spanish gallerist provided his trusting buyer, with a document that substituted collected information relating to several archaeological pieces belonging to a Spanish collection from the 70s making it appear as though the head had been part of a legitimate and documented collection prior to Egypt's antiquities laws tightening in 1983.  A not uncommon technique, suspect dealers have often attempted to "whiten" freshly looted material, by substituting, reusing, or outright fabricating documents of ownership, which, if not carefully explored, cosmetically appear to provide a legitimate "pedigree" to an antiquity which in reality is more recent plunder from an illicit excavation.  

It is for this reason, that the dealer who has been arrested has been charged not only with smuggling and money laundering, but also with document falsification of the object's provenance record. 

Point of reference in 2018, Frédéric Loore revealed in Paris Match that Jaume Bagot's network used various smuggling routes, notably via Egypt and Jordan to the United Arab Emirates, before returning to Catalonia after transiting through Germany or Thailand.

By:  Lynda Albertson

NB: For now, the Spanish authorities have elected to publish their arrest announcement withholding the name of the charged ancient art dealer.  



March 11, 2024

The wacky illicit world of one Ushabti of the Pharaoh Taharqa

The Cultural Heritage Brigade of Spain's Policía Nacional have completed an investigation into a rare, illicitly trafficked, ushabti. The statuette, holding traditional Egyptian agricultural implements, reproduces the text of Chapter 6 of the Book of the Dead and would have been placed in the tomb of the deceased.  Property of the Republic of the Sudan, the funerary figurine was sold to the Rijksmuseum van Oudheden in the Netherlands by "a Catalan antiques dealer". 

Although unnamed in today's press release, the Spanish police did provide some interesting details regarding the sales transaction for this illicit object, which, in turn, also help us to identify who the unnamed dealer in question is.  

Today's press statement indicates that the Spanish investigation began when the Dutch National Polite forwarded their colleagues in Spain a complaint for aggravated fraud that had been filed in the Netherlands by the director of the museum in Leiden regarding their purchase of a suspect ushabti for Pharaoh Taharqa, the 4th king of the 25th Dynasty of Egypt and the Qore of the Kingdom of Kush from 690 to 664 BCE. 

The press release went on to say that "the complaint stated that an antiques dealer, responsible for an antiques establishment in Barcelona, ​​had sold a sculpture of Sudanese origin to the Dutch museum for 100,000 euros" and that the sales transaction was facilitated using false provenance documentation which was presented to provide a cover to the artefact's illicit origin.  Based on the foregoing, the museum then filed their complaint with the Dutch national authorities and were seeking the return of their purchase price.

To facilitate the sale, the police confirmed that the dealer in question had provided the museum with a digital copy of a handwritten document purportedly dating to May 27, 1967 which, at face value, appeared to have been written by an employee of the Sudanese government.  This document also appeared to attest to the fact that the artefact had left the Sudan for London sometime between 1930 and 1940.  

After careful review of this document, which included follow-up examination involving individuals affiliated with the Embassy of the Republic of Sudan in Spain,, as well as with heritage experts specialising in the illicit trafficking of Egyptian material circulating within the ancient art market, the paperwork provided was determined to be a false attestation.  This technique is sometimes used by sellers of illicit material to increase verisimilitude to a work of fiction through the invention and insertion of details into an object's documentation which are presented as factual, when they are not.

Reviewing this document it was determined that the paperwork presented by the dealer to legitimise this object's circulation contained several discrepancies. The most blatant error on the part of the fraudster(s) was that the forged document referenced Sudan's "Ministry of Archeology", a departmental name that has never existed in this African country.  

In 1967 the competent authority tasked with the protection of cultural heritage in the Sudan was the Sudanese Antiquities Service, abbreviated as the SAS (now the National Corporation for Antiquities & Museums - NCAM).  In 1939 the SAS was linked to the Ministry of Education, and by 1953 to the Ministry of Al Maref.  In addition to the above, the signatory of the falsified attestation referred to himself with the title of "general director" for the aforementioned nonexistent ministry.  And while this named individual does match to a person previously affiliated with the government of Sudan, this person never held a position with this title.  Likewise,  their documented signature on official records differs from the one signed and given to the museum substantiating the objects departure from the country.

During this investigation it was also determined that the artefact was one of several artefacts believed to have been stolen from the Gebel Barkal Museum situated on the right (north) bank of the Nile on the SW edge of modern Karima, Sudan which occurred between 2000 and 2003.

The complaint filed by the National Museum of Antiquities in Leiden, concluded that based on the evidence of fraud they were seeking a refund of the purchase price from the Catalan dealer.  The Spanish police press report indicates that the person under investigation, if found guilty, would be responsible for a crime of aggravated fraud by involving assets of artistic, historical and cultural heritage, as well as for exceeding the fraud of 50,000 euros for the object's sale to the Dutch museum. 

But just who is the unnamed Catalan dealer? 

Matching the partial photograph of the ushabti for Pharaoh Taharqa depicted on Spain's press release lead me to a more complete rendering of the object on the Rijksmuseum van Oudheden's accession record.  That record indicates that the Dutch museum purchased the sculpture in 2014 via Spain but not much else in the way of detail on its official collection history.  That same year, Jaume Bagot, of J. Bagot Arqueología, a problematic Catalan dealer who has been mentioned frequently on ARCA's blog, was identified as having brought a 25th Dynasty ushabti of similar proportions to Brussels for the 2014 BRAFA art fair.  Unfortunately, the first Pinterest photo of that event wasn't clear enough to confirm if Bagot's artefact was the one the museum had purchased. 

Going back to Bagot's website we can find a "sold" notice for a Ushabti of the Pharaoh Taharqa. 


The provenance for this piece is listed as follows:

‘Family Babeker, Sudan. In Europe since 1930. Family C., Barcelona, prior 1970.’


This seemed to match to the export date on paperwork the Spanish authorities had, but I still wanted to ensure that I had the right artefact and the right doggy documents presenting dealer, before naming him, so I dug a bit deeper.  I then came across an article by Alain Truong which tells us more regarding the provenance of Bagot's 2014 ushabti. That article listed the collection history for the Spanish dealer's ushabti as:


Provenance:  The family of M. Mustafa Abdalla Babeker, Khartoum, Sudan, 1917 - 1930. Collection of Don C. Bes, 1930. Private European collection, 1940. From the archaeological work at the pyramid of Taharqa, the royal necropolis of Nuri, Nubia.


To be 100 percent certain the objects were a match, I then took the image from J. Bagot Arqueología sales record with the black background and overlayed it with the one attached to the Rijksmuseum van Oudheden accession record.  Without a doubt, the two images reflect an object of the same size and proportion and depict the same object. 

It should be noted that this is not the only "Babeker" provenance artefact sold by Bagot.  In 2017 the Catalan dealer brought another ushabti to Brafa, this one of the King Senkamanisken, the third successor of Taharqa, who likewise was a king buried at Nuri (Sudan) and low and behold it too had the same purported provenance.  Did Bagot use the same attestation letter provided to the Dutch museum? 

So with that, I leave you with a pressing question.  To those of you out there who have handled other objects with Mr. Babeker as your assumed touch stone of pristine provenance, what say you? Any comments from Christie's, or Christie's again or  Sotheby's or Axel Vervoordt or anyone else who has bought or sold a Taharqa or a Senkamanisken ushabti since the early 2000s?  

Care to share your details with the Spanish authorities?  

By: Lynda Albertson

January 21, 2024

Spanish Police Recover 71 Historical Artefacts and Arrest 6 of 10 members of an Art Trafficking Ring


This week the Spanish newspaper El Pais reported on an important victory by the Brigada de Patrimonio Histórico de la Policía Judicial in the recovery of 71 artefacts from the Nasrid, Caliphal, Visigoth, and Renaissance periods and the arrest of a group of individuals now facing varying charges for their individual roles in the circulation of illicit artefacts. The historic pieces recovered, many of which were architectural elements, include stone capitals and columns, plasterwork arches, Islamic beams, an Arab funerary stele, and a partial arrocabe, (an ornament in the form of a frieze at the top border of walls), as well as several sculptures and four Visigoth belt brooches.

The genesis of this Spanish investigation can be traced back to a routine documentation check conducted at a booth during the 2021 Feriarte art fair in Madrid. During this examination, law enforcement officers engaged with the seller, raising inquiries about the provenance and collecting history of a particularly suspicious stone capital.

This object dated to the Emirate of Granada, also known as the Nasrid Kingdom of Granada, the medieval Islamic state that ruled the southern Iberian Peninsula from the 13th to the 15th century.  Established in 1238 after the fall of the Almohad Caliphate, the Nasrid dynasty successfully maintained its independence amidst the Christian Reconquista and is renowned for having fostered a vibrant society characterised by intricate architecture, advanced scholarship, and a rich blend of Islamic, Christian, and Jewish influences, the most important of which is the iconic Alhambra palace complex. 

A review of the capital's paperwork shed important light on a series of irregularities, which, upon further investigation.  The invoice showed that it had been acquired, along with two other capitals, in an antiques establishment in Granada, but had no invoice number and the VAT amount had not been broken down.  This turned out to be the first lead that allowed officers to identify the group of individuals responsible for the circulation and laundering of similar pedigreed artefacts into the ancient art market via Granada, to Barcelona, as well as on to Valencia and Madrid.

Many of these pieces utilised similar false attestations of ownership claiming that the object on offer had  originated from a family collection which could be traced back to an important restorer who worked on the Alhambra two centuries ago.  The paperwork provided also claimed that the cultural property in question had been part of the family's private collection prior to 1985, the year that Law 16/1985 established a new legal framework for the protection, enhancement and transmission to future generations of the Spanish Historical Heritage.  


Following this investigative period, concrete evidence leads to the filing of charges against ten individuals who are alleged to have been involved in this criminal network. Notably, law enforcement have now apprehended five individuals in Granada as well as one antiquities dealer operating in the city of Barcelona.  Four additional implicated members of the same Granada-based family remain at large as some of them are believed to hold Brazilian nationality and were outside the country at the time arrest warrants were executed. 

According to the police, the leaders of the operation were three siblings from Granada, who, operating an antiques business in the city, facilitated the fabrication of documentary evidence which then allowed the network to introduce the illicit pieces into the legal market via their contact in Barcelona, before circulating onward.