 |
| Christie's 2019 Auction |
In November 2019, ARCA published a blog post raising questions about a 5th-century BCE polychrome antefix depicting a dancing maenad, which had been consigned to a Christie’s auction and that I believed the piece warranted closer scrutiny. For those unfamiliar, an antefix is a decorative architectural element once placed along the eaves of ancient roofs to conceal the joints between tiles.
What drew my attention was the striking resemblance between the object at right and three other Etruscan antefixes, also portraying maenads, that had previously been repatriated to Italy after being identified as having been illegal excavated and removed from Italy.
The provenance of the previous, 2019-consigned, antefix up for auction at Christie's read:
Provenance:
In terms of its circulation history, that sparse entry left roughly 2,500 years unaccounted for as nothing prior to 1994 was specified. Knowing a bit about the consignor's background, I knew, that before her death, Ingrid McAlpine had been married to the ancient art dealer Bruce McAlpine, and that prior to their divorce, both were listed as proprietors of McAlpine Ancient Art Limited in the United Kingdom.
The McAlpines’ names have surfaced in connection with other trafficked antiquities that passed through the legitimate art market. Among these is an Attic black-figured hydria which reached the McAlpines through Palladion Antike Kunst, a gallery operated by disgraced dealer Gianfranco Becchina. Their names also appear alongside the red flag names of Robin Symes and Barbara and Lawrence Fleischman, in relation to the donation of a looted Apulian bell-krater, both objects of which were later restituted to Italy.
In addition, former Judge Paolo Giorgio Ferri, the Italian judge who worked heavily on these looting cases, showed me a letter, seized by the Italian authorities during their investigations which was written by the staff of Bruce and Ingrid's McAlpine Ancient Art Gallery. This letter, dated 8 July 1986, tied the couple to at least one transaction with Giacomo Medici and Christian Boursaud and referred obliquely to companies that the later convicted Rome dealer operated through third parties, fronts, or pseudonyms.
Despite my suspicions I still didn't know where that Etruscan dancing maenad came from.
 |
| Villa Giulia, 1937 Excavation |
A few weeks into that investigation, and following a notification from the Carabinieri Command for the Protection of Cultural Heritage, curators Leonardo Bochicchio and Daniele F. Maras of Italy’s Ministry of Culture identified the likely find spot of the disputed object: Campetti Nord. They were able to pinpoint the location precisely, as the National Etruscan Museum of Villa Giulia already held another headless antefix of a dancing maenad, featuring the same polychrome details and stylistic traits. The museum’s specimen had been uncovered during authorised excavations by the Italian Superintendency at the Etruscan sanctuary of Campetti Nord in the autumn of 1937 — a site previously worked over by tombaroli.
The sanctuary lies within the ancient urban area of Veio, also known as Veii, one of the major cities of Etruria and a formidable rival to early Rome. Its ruins rest quietly near the medieval village of Isola Farnese, about fifteen kilometers northwest of Italy's capital, amid the rolling hills and woodlands of what is now the Veio Regional Park. For archaeologists, the city is a treasure of discovery, offering rare insight into the architecture, rituals, and daily life of the Etruscans on the frontier between the Etruscan and Latin worlds.
After much finagling, the story of the first looted antefix was brought to light in an art crime documentary
Lot 448, directed by
Bella Monticelli which highlighted the objects lack of legitimate paperwork or export license and which exposed how difficult it is to identify and document an object with only a few days notice before an appraching sale. Fortunately, with some help from
Bulgari SpA, (who purchased the artefact at auction and donated it, through the Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Activities and Tourism, to the Italian State) the 2019 auctioned dancing maenad joined her sister at the National Etruscan Museum of Villa Giulia, reunited with other ancient artworks from the same archaeological context from which both figures originated.
Fast forward to a 2nd Christie's Antquities auction, scheduled for later this month and it seems we have a third headless lady dancer from Veio.
If you look carefully, by her feet you can make out the hoof of the Silenos this lady would have been dancing with.
After careful restoration that antefix was first seen on the market with Robert Hecht who sold it to the Hunt collection. Next it was circulated via Sotheby's with that collection was liquidated and bought by Robin Symes, who immediately resold it to the Fleischmanns. In1994 the couple exhibited the piece , along with their entire collection, at the J. Paul Getty Museum, before it was formally acquired by the museum in 1996 (96.AD.33).
The piece was restituted to Italy after it was matched by Daniela Rizzo and Maurizio Pellegrino to a polaroid in the Giacomo Medici archive. Like the one up for sale at Christie's now, both artefacts were broken along the lower half and when whole, depicted a Silenos dancing behind the Maenad.
Now let's look at the provenance the auction house has cited.
Elsa Bloch-Diener (1922–2012) was a Swiss art dealer who operated a gallery at Kramgasse 60 in the old town of Bern. She is known to have collaborated with Ines Jucker (née Scherrer, 1922-2013), the scholar and sometimes ancient art dealer responsible for the exhibition catalogue Italy of the Etruscans, cited in the Christie’s lot description as an exhibition where this piece was on view to the public.
Jucker not only authenticated works for Bloch-Diener but also curated the 1991 Etruscan exhibition at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem referenced in the Christie's sale. Also contributing to that exhibition's catalogue were entries by Giovannangelo Camporeale, Fiorella Cottier-Angeli, George Ortiz, and Christoph Reusser, names that have, at times, prompted debate and concern within the field.
In May 2002, when Swiss and Italian authorities raided Gianfranco Becchina's Antike Kunst Palladion, as well as three of Becchina’s storage facilities in Basel, authorities seized documents which identified transactions between the Sicilian and Ines Jucker which documented that she purchased artefacts from this dealer and sold them onwards.
In the Israel exhibition Jucker curated, which featured the antefix up for auction and identified it as coming from the ancient site of Veio, some four hundred Etruscan objects were presented, none of large format, some with an inscriptions. Among them were small bronzes, ceramics, jewellery, terracottas (architectural, votive, and cinerary urns), and sculptural fragments in nenfro. In total they represented all periods and regions of Etruscan art.
The main nucleus of the Israel displayed ensemble came from the collection of the late Ivor and Flora Svarc, many of whose holdings would be donated to the Israel Museum. Svarc's objects were complemented by pieces already in Israeli collections, along with loans from the collector-dealer Jonathan Rosen and other private collectors, mainly in Switzerland.
As cited by Drs David Gill and Christopher Chippindale in
Material Consequences of Contemporary Classical Collecting the vast majority of the artefacts exhibited during this exhibition were previously unpublished. This made this public display of the items their first concretising stop towards having an art marketable pedigree.
Page 197 refers specifically to the artefact currently up for auction:
A number of fragmentary examples of antefixes of this type, as well as of molds for producing them, have come to light at Civita Castellana (Falerii) (see Andrén; Sprenger/Bartoloni), finds which clearly prove their local manufacture. But the votive deposit of Campetti at Veii has yielded the head of a silenos of identical type and made of Veian clay (see Vagnetti 1971), which led P. J. Riis to suggest that this type of antefix was invented at Veii. The lower half of an antefix of this type with a provenance from Veii is in a private collection in Switzerland (see Jucker), and similar fragments have recently been excavated in Rome (see Cristo fani).
With that in mind, it is necessary to return to the same question previously directed at Christie’s:
On what evidentiary basis, supported by what verifiable documentation, did the auction house authorise the consignment of this artefact? In the absence of any demonstrable chain of custody or export records, the decision to green-light its sale raises serious concerns regarding the robustness of the auction house’s internal due diligence procedures.
In this case, the question is not rhetorical but fundamental. Is Christie’s in possession of any concrete paperwork supporting the legitimacy of this Dancing Maenad’s appearance on the market, or was the absence of evidence simply overlooked given its publication in an exhibition, in the hope that the object’s passage through the auction process would escape closer scrutiny.
0 comments:
Post a Comment