I have long been fascinated by the reddish-buff clay figures of barefoot women placed along the eaves of ancient Etruscan roofs. Dressed in impeccably folded, vividly coloured chitons, women like the protagonist of this article once danced in procession, some alongside their companion Silenus, caught in revelry with the wine god Dionysus. They were meant to watch over temples, to move eternally in rhythm above daily life.
How this happily intoxicated woman was smuggled out of Italy and into a "Private Collection, Switzerland" remains a mystery, though the contours of her journey are painfully familiar. Long before she caught my attention, others before me had been chasing their own trafficked ladies, recognising them instantly when they surfaced on the art market with little or contrived collection histories, a tell-tale sign that they did not run away voluntarily, and instead were the byproducts of clandestine excavations, conducted in Etruscan cities.
For two decades, Italian authorities have known just how desirable these elegant women are to collectors and museums. Maurizio Fiorilli, Italy's avvocato dello Stato and ARCA lecturer Stefano Alessandrini chased them. As did Paolo Giorgo Ferri, Rome's Sostituto Procuratore della Repubblica working closely alongside Dr. Daniela Rizzo and Maurizio Pelligrini from the Villa Giulia.
Left and Middle: Restituted from the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek Right: Restitute from the J. Paul Getty Museum
Thanks to painstaking legal and scientific work, sifting through the stacks of probative evidence supporting Italy’s claims and in close collaboration with Italy's Carabinieri Command for the Protection of Cultural Heritage, some of these trafficked Maenads have found their way home. The first was acquired by the J. Paul Getty Museum in 1996 and returned to Italy in 2007 and the others were relinquished by the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek in 2016, though only after years and years of foot dragging.
Paolo and Maurizio both shared with me the chillingly coded language used by American dealer Bob Hech when discussing the delivery of "children" by his associate Fritz Bürki in a letter written to Mogens Gjødesen, the Copenhagen museum's director from 1970 to 1978.
Dear Mogens,
Since Bürki is anxious to see Copenhagen, I shall let him accompany the children (provided Swiss or Swedish - excuse me - Scandinavian airlines permits the children inside). If not, he will send them. If he does, he would advise you in advance, so that your shipper might be there to help him. Maybe I too shall come. We figured some time around the 4th - 6th January.
All the best to you + Marianne
Sinc..
B
Left: Antefix recovered from London Right: Antefix found at excavations conducted in 1938-39 at the Campetti di Veio, collection of Villa Giulia
Seeing these historic objects as the embodiment of actual people, children no less, made my blood boil. And it wasn't too long after that when I began my own hunt for ancient lost souls. My first pursuit led to the identification and with a lot of effort on many people's part, the recovery of a Maenad from Veii offered for sale at Christie’s London.
Her journey became the narrative spine of Lot 448, a documentary which premiered at the 2021 virtual Tribeca Film Festival sponsored by Bulgari and directed by Bella Monticelli. Remember her name. She too caught the antiquities trafficking bug, and ARCA will share more of her work as a trafficking sleuth in the near future.
But back to the 6th century BCE "Hurrying Maenad" who is the protagonist of this article.
She too was spotted at Christie's, though this time in New York. I came across that piece in an exhibition catalogue for an event held during the summer of 1991 at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem, highlighting recent donations from the the Etruscan collection of the late Ivor Svarc of California along with loans of supplementary material from Jonathan Rosen, the business partner of Robert Hecht, the Musée d'Art et d'Histoire in Geneva and from private collectors and other museum collections in Israel.
Aside from the fact that the photo on the cover of this exhibition catalogue depicts another suspect artefact, a terracotta pair of galloping horses, inside the thick book contains entries by Giovannangelo Camporeale, Fiorella Cottier-Angeli, George Ortiz, and Christoph Reusser, names that have, at times, prompted debate and concern within the field. Each of these authors collaborated with Ines Jucker (née Scherrer, 1922-2013), the scholar and sometimes ancient art dealer responsible for curating the exhibition cited in the Christie’s lot description for the piece.
The provenance for this headless woman in the Christie's sale read:
Private Collection, Switzerland, acquired from the above, 1975;
thence by descent to the current owner.
Elsa Bloch-Diener (1922–2012) too was a Swiss art dealer who operated a gallery at Kramgasse 60 in the old town of Bern. She too collaborated with Jucker who authenticated pieces on her behalf.
Returned from the United States in late December, This latest recovered Maenad will rest her feet for a while at the Museum of Rescued Art, within the Octagonal Hall of the Baths of Diocletian, alongside her sister, the antefixes returned from the Getty and the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek.
Together, Each speaks softly of journeys not of their own making. Torn from the cities they once animated and roughly carried across borders and oceans by unseen hands, these barefoot girls, forever poised in music and motion, remind us that the paths traced by looted objects are rarely their own. Their return is not simply a matter of geography, but of belonging restored after years of forced removal.
Brough back from the United States in later December, this new recovery will go on display at the Museum of Rescued Art, housed in the Octagonal Hall of the Baths of Diocletian, alongside the J. Paul Getty and Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek antefixes showing just how far barefoot girls playing instruments can travel.
I suspect this will not be the last of the ladies dedicated officers and heritage crime analysts identify. Their music still lingers, echoing across centuries, waiting for those willing to listen closely enough to bring them home. And I for one am grateful to the Carabinieri for doing the heavy lifting to bring this girl home.
In November 2019, ARCA published a blog post raising questions about a 5th-century BCE polychrome antefix depicting a dancing maenad, which had been consigned to a Christie’s auction and that I believed the piece warranted closer scrutiny. For those unfamiliar, an antefix is a decorative architectural element once placed along the eaves of ancient roofs to conceal the joints between tiles.
What drew my attention was the striking resemblance between the object at right and three other Etruscan antefixes, also portraying maenads, that had previously been repatriated to Italy after being identified as having been illegal excavated and removed from Italy.
The provenance of the previous, 2019-consigned, antefix up for auction at Christie's read:
In terms of its circulation history, that sparse entry left roughly 2,500 years unaccounted for as nothing prior to 1994 was specified. Knowing a bit about the consignor's background, I knew, that before her death, Ingrid McAlpine had been married to the ancient art dealer Bruce McAlpine, and that prior to their divorce, both were listed as proprietors of McAlpine Ancient Art Limited in the United Kingdom.
In addition, former Judge Paolo Giorgio Ferri, the Italian judge who worked heavily on these looting cases, showed me a letter, seized by the Italian authorities during their investigations which was written by the staff of Bruce and Ingrid's McAlpine Ancient Art Gallery. This letter, dated 8 July 1986, tied the couple to at least one transaction with Giacomo Medici and Christian Boursaud and referred obliquely to companies that the later convicted Rome dealer operated through third parties, fronts, or pseudonyms.
Despite my suspicions I still didn't know where that Etruscan dancing maenad came from.
Villa Giulia, 1937 Excavation
A few weeks into that investigation, and following a notification from the Carabinieri Command for the Protection of Cultural Heritage, curators Leonardo Bochicchio and Daniele F. Maras of Italy’s Ministry of Culture identified the likely find spot of the disputed object: Campetti Nord. They were able to pinpoint the location precisely, as the National Etruscan Museum of Villa Giulia already held another headless antefix of a dancing maenad, featuring the same polychrome details and stylistic traits. The museum’s specimen had been uncovered during authorised excavations by the Italian Superintendency at the Etruscan sanctuary of Campetti Nord in the autumn of 1937 — a site previously worked over by tombaroli.
The sanctuary lies within the ancient urban area of Veio, also known as Veii, one of the major cities of Etruria and a formidable rival to early Rome. Its ruins rest quietly near the medieval village of Isola Farnese, about fifteen kilometers northwest of Italy's capital, amid the rolling hills and woodlands of what is now the Veio Regional Park. For archaeologists, the city is a treasure of discovery, offering rare insight into the architecture, rituals, and daily life of the Etruscans on the frontier between the Etruscan and Latin worlds.
After much finagling, the story of the first looted antefix was brought to light in an art crime documentary Lot 448, directed by Bella Monticelli which highlighted the objects lack of legitimate paperwork or export license and which exposed how difficult it is to identify and document an object with only a few days notice before an appraching sale. Fortunately, with some help from Bulgari SpA, (who purchased the artefact at auction and donated it, through the Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Activities and Tourism, to the Italian State) the 2019 auctioned dancing maenad joined her sister at the National Etruscan Museum of Villa Giulia, reunited with other ancient artworks from the same archaeological context from which both figures originated.
Fast forward to a 2nd Christie's Antquities auction, scheduled for later this month and it seems we have a third headless lady dancer from Veio.
After careful restoration that antefix was first seen on the market with Robert Hecht who sold it to the Hunt collection. Next it was circulated via Sotheby's with that collection was liquidated and bought by Robin Symes, who immediately resold it to the Fleischmanns. In1994 the couple exhibited the piece , along with their entire collection, at the J. Paul Getty Museum, before it was formally acquired by the museum in 1996 (96.AD.33). The piece was restituted to Italy after it was matched by Daniela Rizzo and Maurizio Pellegrino to a polaroid in the Giacomo Medici archive. Like the one up for sale at Christie's now, both artefacts were broken along the lower half and when whole, depicted a Silenos dancing behind the Maenad.
Now let's look at the provenance the auction house has cited.
Elsa Bloch-Diener (1922–2012) was a Swiss art dealer who operated a gallery at Kramgasse 60 in the old town of Bern. She is known to have collaborated with Ines Jucker (née Scherrer, 1922-2013), the scholar and sometimes ancient art dealer responsible for the exhibition catalogue Italy of the Etruscans, cited in the Christie’s lot description as an exhibition where this piece was on view to the public.
Jucker not only authenticated works for Bloch-Diener but also curated the 1991 Etruscan exhibition at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem referenced in the Christie's sale. Also contributing to that exhibition's catalogue were entries by Giovannangelo Camporeale, Fiorella Cottier-Angeli, George Ortiz, and Christoph Reusser, names that have, at times, prompted debate and concern within the field.
In May 2002, when Swiss and Italian authorities raided Gianfranco Becchina's Antike Kunst Palladion, as well as three of Becchina’s storage facilities in Basel, authorities seized documents which identified transactions between the Sicilian and Ines Jucker which documented that she purchased artefacts from this dealer and sold them onwards.
In the Israel exhibition Jucker curated, which featured the antefix up for auction and identified it as coming from the ancient site of Veio, some four hundred Etruscan objects were presented, none of large format, some with an inscriptions. Among them were small bronzes, ceramics, jewellery, terracottas (architectural, votive, and cinerary urns), and sculptural fragments in nenfro. In total they represented all periods and regions of Etruscan art.
The main nucleus of the Israel displayed ensemble came from the collection of the late Ivor and Flora Svarc, many of whose holdings would be donated to the Israel Museum. Svarc's objects were complemented by pieces already in Israeli collections, along with loans from the collector-dealer Jonathan Rosen and other private collectors, mainly in Switzerland.
As cited by Drs David Gill and Christopher Chippindale in Material Consequences of Contemporary Classical Collectingthe vast majority of the artefacts exhibited during this exhibition were previously unpublished. This made this public display of the items their first concretising stop towards having an art marketable pedigree.
Page 197 refers specifically to the artefact currently up for auction:
A number of fragmentary examples of antefixes of this type, as well as of molds for producing them, have come to light at Civita Castellana (Falerii) (see Andrén; Sprenger/Bartoloni), finds which clearly prove their local manufacture. But the votive deposit of Campetti at Veii has yielded the head of a silenos of identical type and made of Veian clay (see Vagnetti 1971), which led P. J. Riis to suggest that this type of antefix was invented at Veii. The lower half of an antefix of this type with a provenance from Veii is in a private collection in Switzerland (see Jucker), and similar fragments have recently been excavated in Rome (see Cristo fani).
With that in mind, it is necessary to return to the same question previously directed at Christie’s:
On what evidentiary basis, supported by what verifiable documentation, did the auction house authorise the consignment of this artefact? In the absence of any demonstrable chain of custody or export records, the decision to green-light its sale raises serious concerns regarding the robustness of the auction house’s internal due diligence procedures.
In this case, the question is not rhetorical but fundamental. Is Christie’s in possession of any concrete paperwork supporting the legitimacy of this Dancing Maenad’s appearance on the market, or was the absence of evidence simply overlooked given its publication in an exhibition, in the hope that the object’s passage through the auction process would escape closer scrutiny.
⇏ Ashraf Omar Eldarir (see our earlier post today).
⇏ Anything with any spelling that says something like ex-private Ezeldeen Taha Eldarir collection; ex-Salahaddin Sirmali collection.
⇏ Anything with "formerly Collection Salah al-Din Sarmali Bey. Acquired by Izz al-Din Tah al-Darir Bey in Egypt.
In our third story, we examined how the insatiable U.S. demand for Egyptian antiquities between 2012 until 2020, and the ease with which illicit pieces could be laundered into the licit market and resold, often for substantial sums—created fertile ground for smugglers like Mr. Eldarir. We also expanded our growing list of his identifiable imports and published an example of one of his forged provenance letters, and raised the obvious elephant-in-the-room question: catching one man with 590 artefacts in his suitcases is one thing, but what about the 'don’t ask, don’t tell' dealers and auction houses who eagerly absorbed his material into the supply chain? Eldarir’s scheme relied on fabricated attestation letters and never once produced an export license or verifiable proof of ownership, yet the ancient art market had welcomed his goods all the same.
In February 2025 we reported that after a prolonged federal court case, Eldarir had finally elected to do what most federally charged individuals tend to (eventually) do. Knowing he stood a snowball's chance in hell of being found not guilty, the former doctor-turned-smuggler pleaded out, admitting that he had smuggled ancient Egyptian artefacts into the United States over a series of trips to and from his home country. In theory, for his role in these affairs, US sentencing guidelines estimated that he could serve as many as three to five years behind bars and might even face denaturalisation, which could send him back to the very country that he so prolifically robbed.
ARCA continued to ask what happened to these two high value pieces sold through Christie's to a dealer in Switzerland.
One was this portrait head of a man, sold first through Christies New York in 2012 for $52,500. Despite the trafficker's arrest in the US, this piece was still up for sale during the COVID-affected TEFAF Maastricht art fair in 2020, at the stand of Swiss dealer, Jean David Cahn. Here the piece was called "a Portrait Head of the Emperor Severus Alexander" with a price on request.
A second, was also present at TEFAF at Cahn's stand: a Double Life sized Ptolemaic Royal Portrait Possibly Ptolemy III Euergetes.
In much of the reporting around this case, some journalists have zeroed in on the fact that the British Museum once purchased an Eldarir-smuggled ushabti through Mousa Khouli’s Palmyra Heritage, a New York gallery run by a convicted trafficker of Egyptian cultural property. It makes for easy headlines: the BM’s missteps are as consumable in the press as gossip about the British royal family.
But what most of those articles miss is the quieter truth, that it was not scandal but diligence that first turned the tide. Staff at the British Museum recognised that the ushabti in question could be tied directly to a known looting incident in Egypt. Rather than turn a blind eye, this staffer flagged their concerns to law enforcement, providing a crucial lead that put Eldarir on the radar of U.S. authorities.
Forensic investigations often depend on this kind of vigilance: the quiet, careful work of scholars who hardly ever make the headlines, but whose interventions are critical in making cases viable. In this instance, the unsung hero was not a prosecutor, a journalist, or an independent scholar, but a museum professional working to keep their own museum clean, and who refused to ignore the red flags of objects under their care.
In a significant case of cultural property smuggling, previously reported on ARCA's blog, Ashraf Omar Eldarir, a naturalised U.S. citizen from Brooklyn, plead guilty before Judge Rachel Kovner yesterday in US Federal Court, in the state of New York, for his role in the smuggling of hundreds of Egyptian artefacts.
Upon arriving at John F. Kennedy International Airport on January 22, 2020 from an international flight from Egypt, Eldarir had submitted a customs declaration form to U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency (CBP), as required for all travellers entering the United States. On that form, he had stated that he was bringing in merchandise and agricultural products worth $300. However, when CBP officers inspected his luggage, instead of finding low value business related products, they discovered three suitcases filled from top to bottom with antiquities wrapped in protective packaging.
Inside Eldarir's careful bubblewrap and foam padding were a total of 590 Egyptian artefacts. Some of these still had sand and soil adhering to them, a telltale sign which underscored their recent excavation, and, in the words of the agents examining his luggage, still smelled of wet earth.
Given that he was unable to provide the customs agents with sufficient proof that the packaged artefacts he was importing into New York had legally been exported from Egypt prior to the enactment of the country's 06 August 1983 Law No. 117 "on the Protection of Antiquities, CBP seized the antiquities pending further investigation.
thirty-one (31) ancient Egyptian talismans (Ptolemaic period);
fourteen (14) ancient beads;
twenty-six (26) ancient Egyptian wooden figures;
four hundred (400) ancient Egyptian faience ushabtis;
three (3) ancient Egyptian wooden panels with painted figures;
one ( I ) ancient Egyptian large stone face;
two (2) Egyptian wooden masks;
two (2) Egyptian stone panels with hieroglyphics;
three (3) ancient Egyptian canopic jar lids;
two (2) ancient Greco-Roman stela;
one (1) ancient Greco-Roman terracotta headless torso with robes;
seven (7) ancient Greco-Roman terracotta statues;
three (3) ancient Egyptian large terracotta vases;
two (2) Egyptian smalIterracotta vases;
two (2) Egyptian alabaster artifacts;
two (2) ancient Egyptian Osiris headpieces/crowns;
twenty-six (26) ancient Greco-Roman oil lamps;
one (1) Greco-Roman terracotta pilgrim's flask;
one (1) ancient Egyptian polychrome relief.
For years prior to his arrest, Eldarir had been successfully laundering plundered artefacts onto the licit ancient art market. Often his pieces carried with them a fabricated provenance claiming that the pieces were part of "The Ashraf Eldarir Private Collection of Ancient Art, New York, USA", or "Acquired by Izz al-Din Tah al-Darir Bey in Egypt December 1946 from Salah al-Din Sarmali Bey" or that they had been inherited through the trafficker's grandfather.
To disguise their illicit origins, and to cosmetically claim that the pieces were derived from a collection which predated Egypt's ban on export, Eldarir's trafficked artefacts sometimes mentioned that his grandfather or "Ezeldeen Eldarir," was a friend of Prince of Egypt, Omar Tosson, with whom he shared a passion for archaeology or that the collection had been formed during the 1930s-1940s, mostly as gifts from Prince Tosson, which he claimed had been moved to the United States "in 1948 where it remained with the family until the present day."
With no export licenses, and no factual proof which supported his vague claims of long term ownership for the pieces he handled, aside from what would turned out to be self-made documents giving a cosmetic overhaul of legitimacy, Eldarir's smuggled antiquities circulated among US and Europe's prestigious ancient art galleries from 2012 until shortly after his arrest was announced publicly. After which ARCA published a list of material it had identified as being linked to the suspect trafficker. This compilation of suspect Egyptian antiquities was made public on 8 July 2020, and can be found here.
One of the more interesting high value pieces was this portrait head of a man, sold first through Christies New York in 2012 for $52,500. Despite the trafficker's arrest in the US, this piece was still up for sale during the COVID-affected TEFAF Maastricht art fair in 2020, at the stand of Swiss dealer, Jean David Cahn. Here the piece was called "a Portrait Head of the Emporer Severus Alexander" with a price on request.
A second Eldarar piece was also present at TEFAF at Cahn's stand: a Double Life sized Ptolemaic Royal Portrait Possibly Ptolemy III Euergetes. Again with a price on request. As the fair closed early due to the world-wide pandemic, it is unclear if these pieces sold or remain with the Swiss dealer.
After ARCA's list of Eldarir identifications went public, practically all digital mention of Egyptian artefacts tied to this suspect in Europe and in the United States, began to be removed from receiving dealers' websites. Dealers with web pages which once openly advertised Eldarir's antiquities sometimes removed the tainted objects altogether from their listings or modified the web page provenance using less damning indicators, such as replacing the background detail on ownership with innocuous phrases such as "private collector, New York" and omitting any of the previously fabricated details which led back to this suspect art market actor or his ties to princely collections.
Eldarir’s case is one among many that highlight the persistent problems of artefact smuggling. For his role in these affairs, sentencing guidelines estimate that he could likely have to serve three to five years behind bars as well as possible denaturalisation, sending him back to the very country that he so prolifically robbed.
His sentencing date is currently scheduled for 12 June 2025.
The fate of many of the antiquities on our list remain unknown.
On March 30, 2016 in Paris, France UNESCO held a large multidisciplinary symposium examining the movement of cultural property in 2016. The Paris event was facilitated in part because of the conflicts ravaging the Middle East, particularly in Iraq and the Syrian Arab Republic, as well as in Libya and in Yemen, which had led to a surge in trafficking in cultural property, mainly archaeological objects. The meeting was also arranged to discuss how the sale of antiquities could be used to finance crime highlighting Resolution 2199, which had been unanimously adopted by UN Security Council on 12 February 2015. By holding the meeting UNESCO hoped to:
Invited speaker Vincent Geerling, Chairman of the Board of the International Association of Dealers in Ancient Art (IADAA) and then-director of Archea Ancient Art gallery in Amsterdam told the audience in Paris, as he had previously in Berlin in 2014, that many art dealers and sellers have good knowledge of where their stock originates from, but acknowledged that consignors haven't always kept good paperwork to prove it. Asking for a show of hands from the audience, Greeling asked if any of the UNESCO invitees had ever inherited an antique from a relative that came without its original collecting documentation.
When discussing collection histories as they relate to the current situation in the MENA region, Geerling proclaimed, complete with an accompanying powerpoint slide, that:
"during the past two years, IADAA has checked with every member to ask if anything from the troubled areas had been offered and they reported back not a single dodgy Syrian or Iraqi object had been offered to any of our members"
Laster, in June 2016, Geerling spoke again, this time at the ArtConnoisseurs 2016 series, held in conjunction with Cultures – The World Arts Fair in Brussels.
In that talk, recorded in the video above, Geerling discussed IADAA's strict form of due diligence and highlighted in his slides that the Association maintained a code of ethics which included due diligence guidelines for members dealing in Classical, Egyptian and Near East antiquities. During this lecture Geerling went on to say:
"the past is a funny place, they do things differently there. In the 1960s and ’70s...the old days... not all dealers in ancient art behaved like virtuous schoolboys, but those who founded the International Association of Dealers in Ancient Art in 1993 understood that a different attitude was vital and acted on the UNESCO 1970 Convention even before their respective governments did."
Geerling also proudly stated that membership [in IADAA] is highly sought after, but hard to achieve, and that applications are rigorously vetted. Like with the earlier UNESCO presentation, Geerling underscored that:
"During the past two years, IADAA has checked several times with every member to see if they have been offered anything from the troubled areas, and they reported back: no, not a single questionable Syrian or Iraqi object had been offered to any of our members."
At least one of those, an Egyptian stone lintel, depicting Hau and his wife Khouti " went up for sale in Paris on 29 May 2013. For 15 years, beginning on/around 2007, the archaeology department of Pierre Bergé et Associés was headed by indicted dealer Christophe Kunicki, a position he held for 15 years prior to his arrest.
As per the Art Newspaper, while standing trial at the Paris criminal court on 30-31 August 2022, Wormser told the court during his that he "stopped buying from Finatrading because it failed to deliver proper provenance documents." Yet the 61-year-old former IADAA-affiliated dealer didn't stop at the purchase of just one or two items from the Swiss Freeport king. Investigative documents purport that Galerie L’Etoile d'Ishtar purchased as many as 90 antiquities from Finatrading between 2003 and 2005, and then had those objects shipped from Switzerland by Bouvier's Paris connected firm, Art Transit & Associés SA.
According to the leaked Panama papers, Yves Bouvier established Finatrading Development Ltd. via the firm Mossack Fonseca law chambers in the BVI in 1995. This startup date is just one year after Yves Bouvier's father formed Expositions Natural Le Coutre S.A., and shortly before his own fast-moving climb to wealth in the art market and freeport worlds. Bouvier now rents nearly a quarter of the Ports Francs et Entrepôts de Genève Freeport and owns between 5-6 percent of the Swiss firm.
Early transactions occur at the same time Swiss Customs, in 2003, uncovered >200 trafficked Egyptian artefacts housed at the Geneva Freeport behind door 5.23.1 in 2002. That stash, later restituted to Egypt, included two perfectly preserved Egyptian mummies, sarcophagi, statues and various hacked apart coffin faces removed from wooden coffins to be sold onward as mummy masks.
The 2003 seized ancient objects had been smuggled out of Egypt through a complicated network of identified smugglers which implicated 15 Egyptians, two Swiss residents, two Germans, and one Canadian. Whether or not the objects Wormser purchased via Bouvier passed through the hands of this clan remains a topic meriting further exploration.
All of which brings me back to the words of IADAA's chairman in June 2016 when Vincent Geerling stated:
"The trade is as horrified by the destruction and iconoclasm as anyone else and we share a common cause in wishing to defeat it.
The trade has more incentive than anyone else to stop the crooks because of the damage they are causing the reputation of the legitimate trade.
We will not find a workable solution unless all parties to the debate work together, including the trade."
Geerling's June 2016 talk also stated that members of the association knows what it takes to sell antiquities: well-provenanced antiquities in glossy catalogues, posh galleries and expensive art fairs.
I guess two out of three ain't bad.
ARCA thinks it's time for the trade to put its art market money where its mouth is and to admit that the lack of transparency in the ancient art trade makes it a welcoming home for money laundering and illicit transactions. One with shell companies and offshore accounts which are designed to shield willing dealers and collectors from risk and which makes law enforcement officers' work in investigating this type of crime all the more difficult.
It is time for IADAA to stop putting their collective heads in the sand and to honestly admit they have no way of monitoring their membership's actions.
Early last November we wrote a blog post asking Christie's about an interesting polychrome painted 5th century BCE antefix in the form of a dancing maenad. It had been scheduled to come up for sale in their December 4, 2019 auction and I felt the artefact deserved a closer examination regarding its legitimacy on the ancient art market. For those who do not know, an anteflix is a decorative upright ornament, used by ancient builders along the eaves of a roof to conceal tile joints.
The provenance of the antefex was listed by Christie's as follows:
While nothing before 1994 was specified in Christie's single-line collection history, we know that before she died Ingrid McAlpine was once the wife of Bruce McAlpine, and for a time, before their divorce, both were proprietors of McAlpine Ancient Art Limited in the UK.
While not completely identical, the Christie's antefix closely resembles another ancient Etruscan antefix in the form of a maenad and Silenus. This one once graced the cover of the exhibition catalog "A Passion for Antiquities: Ancient Art from the Collection of Barbara and Lawrence Fleischman" depicted to the left.
That South Etruscan, 500-475 BCE, polychrome anteflix was purchased by the J. Paul Getty Museum from the Barbara and Lawrence Fleischman collection via Robin Symes for a tidy sum of $396,000 and displayed in an exhibition at the Cleveland Museum of Art back in 1995. In 2007, that antefix was restituted back to Italy by the J. Paul Getty Museum after a Polaroid photo, recovered during a 1995 police raid on warehouse space rented by Giacomo Medici at Ports Francs & Entrepôts in Geneva, was matched to the artefact in the California museum's collection.
The Christie's auction dancing maenad also closely resembled another pair of suspect polychrome antefixes depicting a maenad and Silenus. This grouping was once part of the collection of the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek museum. Like with the J. Paul Getty purchase, an image of one of the Copenhagen antefix and a foot were matched with photos law enforcement seized in the dealer Giacomo Medici's business dossier. Eventually, as with the J. Paul Getty Museum, the Danes relinquished the pair of objects back to Italy.
In addition, former Judge Paolo Giorgio Ferri, the Italian judge who worked heavily on these looting cases, showed me a letter, seized by the Italian authorities during their investigations which was written by the staff of Bruce and Ingrid McAlpine Ancient Art Gallery. This letter, dated 8 July 1986, tied them once again to at least one transaction with Giacomo Medici and Christian Boursaud and referred obliquely to companies the convicted dealer operated through third parties, fronts or pseudonyms.
All of which lead me to several (more) questions.
Why was Bruce Alpine's name, and the name of his ancient art firm conveniently omitted from the provenance record published by Christie's ahead of the December 4th auction?
Was this omission an accidental oversight on Christie's part or an elective decision, perhaps as a way to reduce the possibility of the object's previous owners connections to the above mentioned dealers drawing unnecessary attention?
What collection history did the auction house have, if any, that shows where or with whom this artefact belonged prior to the 1994 McAlpine acquisition date to demonstrate its legitimacy in the ancient art market?
Given that three antefixes depicting satyrs and maenads had already been returned to Italy as coming from clandestine excavations I brought my concerns to other Italian experts collaborating with ARCA, and to experts from the Villa Giulia, the Louvre, and to the Carabinieri TPC. Each acknowledged I had a right to be suspicious.
ARCA forensic researchers and a forensic archaeologist affiliated with the Louvre Museum pointed me to examples of molds that have been discovered at Etruscan excavations which also depict maenads and helped with comparison imaging. Researchers in Rome who worked on the Becchina and Medici case identifications with the Rome courts pointed out similar antefixes from the ancient Etruscan cities of Veii and Falerii Veteres, which are part of Rome's Villa Giulia collection. Both zones, situated on the southern limits of Etruria, were looted extensively.
But I was running out of time and without a smoking gun photo of the object in a looted state, I was also running out of evidence and leads.
I watched the days tick down until the item went up for auction and then sold, in just under two minutes of bidding. Frustrated, and thinking this little lady was lost for the present, I filed my research away, hoping that down the road she might reappear and that by that point the Carabinieri, MiBACT or I might have more evidence, enough to build upon to make a case for restitution.
Surprisingly, BVLGARI, the Italian luxury brand came to the aid of its country and one frustrated antiquities researcher. They too had been watching the auction and knew of our efforts to try and bring our girl home. Unbeknownst to me the jewelry firm had purchased the antefix, and then working through cultural diplomacy channels, donated it, through the Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Activities and Tourism, to the Italian State and to the Villa Giulia specifically.
Looking back, with a view from the client's side of the equation:
When one wants to bid at an auction at Christie's, over the telephone, or online, a buyer has to prove that he or she is legitimate. To do so they must email the auction house a digital photo or PDF scan of a valid photo ID (eg. Driver’s Licence, Passport), and a proof of address. For this proof, they will accept a recent utility bill or bank statement or corporate documents. With these verifiable and valid documents, the auction house then trusts the potential buyer enough to open up an account in his or her name.
But Christie's seemed to need much less convincing paperwork before accepting the antefix of the dancing maenad for consignment. Having reviewed the provenance paperwork for this antiquity, this antiquity came with only two, not very convincing documents, one of which had no dates whatsoever.
Those were:
1.) An undated document, which Christie's referred to as a "McAlpine stock card" for stock No. 2/114 noting a vendor in the name of ‘Kuhn’ of a "Terracotta antefix in the form of an akrotère." As mentioned above, an antefix, which comes from the Latin word antefigere, (to fasten before), is an architectural fixture which caps then end tiles of a tiled roof.
An akarotère is an architectural ornament placed on a flat pedestal called a plinth and is an ornamental sculpture or pedestal such as the one to the right. These sit above the pediment of a Classical temple and do not extend from the ends of roof tiles. I also failed to find any Akarotères that picture a dancing maenad.
2.) An 8 February 1994 pricing document with no company names listed anywhere, which listed 15 carefully redacted artworks and one final artefact at the very bottom which listing item 2/156 as "an Antefix with musician, height 40 cm" with a list price of $35,000.
As with the first document, this second is puzzling. The height of the listed object is slightly off, the stock number doesn't match, and the price indicated is three times higher than the antefix at Christie's sold for. And while the paper is dated 1994 in keeping with Christie's stated provenance, this document by no means shows that the document references the McAlpine's acquisition as it lists no company the purchase was made through and seems merely to be an price listing from some unidentified entity. The visible item's description is also a bit puzzling. While the Christie's maenad does depict her carrying a crotalum (a kind of clapper) in her right hand, it would be a stretch to call her a musician. Even if she could be described as a musician, generally speaking if you know the word antefix, its reasonable to assume you would be familiar with their depictions in history. Why use the word pairing "with musician" instead of using "of a musician" or "of a maenad"?
This was all the documentation Christie's needed to consider an object valid for sale to a willing buyer?
They should be ashamed of themselves.
Yet, at least we have a somewhat happy ending BVLGARI's donation. Despite being auctioned and despite a long delay due to the COVID pandemic, she's finally home, and today, at 4pm, at a formal restitution ceremony, this lovely dancing lady took her place with her companions, in the Etruscan exhibition Colors of the Etruscans**atRome's Centrale Montemartini.
On the left the antefix as offered for sale by Christies. On the right the antefix at the Museo Nazionale Etrusco di Villa Giulia. This antefix was found in 1937 in Veii, in the course of regular excavations of the Soprintendenza at the Etruscan sanctuary of Campetti North: a site previously looted by tombaroli. It seems evident that both antefixes were cast from the same mould and decorated in the same workshop. Therefore, most probably were originally part of the decoration of a single building.
On hand for the restitution celebration were:
Claudio Parisi Presicce, Capitoline Superintendency for Cultural Heritage -Director of Archaeological and Historical - Artistic Museums
Valentino Nizzo, Director of the National Etruscan Museum of Villa Giulia
Margherita Eichberg, ABAP Superintendent for the Metropolitan area of Rome, the Province of Viterbo and Southern Etruria
Sara Neri, Direzione Generale Archeologia Belle Arti e Paesaggio (Service IV, Circulation)
Lt. Col.. Nicola Candido, Carabinieri Command for the Protection of Cultural Heritage
Leonardo Bochicchio, Daniele F. Maras, curators of the exhibition
I for one am glad she's home, and to also have been a part of her journey. She's travelled a long way, from the Etruscan city of Veii, to London, and back home again. May her bare feet forever dance on Italian soil.
Stopped on 22 January 2020 upon arrival to John F. Kennedy International Airport from overseas, Eldarir provided US Customs and Border Protection authorities at the U.S. port of entry with a CBP declaration form, the double-sided slip of paper everyone entering the US must complete and hand over to U.S. Customs and Border Protection upon arrival declaring the value of the goods they are bringing in from overseas. On this form, Eldarir declared that he was only carrying merchandise and agricultural products valued at $300. Instead, upon inspection of his belonging by CBP personnel, Eldarir was found to be transporting three suitcases full of bubble and foam-wrapped packages.
When unwrapped for further inspection by border patrol agents, the packages were found to contain 590 ancient artifacts, some of which still had adhering sand and soil, a signal which betrays their having been recently excavated. Questioned by the authorities about the contents of his luggage, Eldarir was unable to produce any documentation which would show that he had obtained authorization from the Egyptian authorities for the exportation of the objects he was transporting.
If convicted of one, or both charges, Eldarir will face a penalty of up to 20 years in prison for each count. The United States will also seek forfeiture of the following antiquities in accordance with: (a) Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2)(B):
forty-one (41) ancient Egyptian gold artifacts;
nineteen (19) ancient coins;
two (2) Greco-Roman rings;
thirty-one (31) ancient Egyptian talismans (Ptolemaic period);
fourteen (14) ancient beads;
twenty-six (26) ancient Egyptian wooden figures;
four hundred (400) ancient Egyptian faience ushabtis;
three (3) ancient Egyptian wooden panels with painted figures;
one ( I ) ancient Egyptian large stone face;
two (2) Egyptian wooden masks;
two (2) Egyptian stone panels with hieroglyphics;
three (3) ancient Egyptian canopic jar lids;
two (2) ancient Greco-Roman stela;
one (1) ancient Greco-Roman terracotta headless torso with robes;
seven (7) ancient Greco-Roman terracotta statues;
three (3) ancient Egyptian large terracotta vases;
two (2) Egyptian smalIterracotta vases;
two (2) Egyptian alabaster artifacts;
two (2) ancient Egyptian Osiris headpieces/crowns;
twenty-six (26) ancient Greco-Roman oil lamps;
one (1) Greco-Roman terracotta pilgrim's flask;
one (1) ancient Egyptian polychrome relief.
How long Mr. Eldarir has been at this remains to be disclosed. But these pieces are just the tip of a growing iceberg.
He also sold a Limestone Relief Fragment for £28,750 via Alexander Biesbroek. Same provenance, same question as to what proof of export Mr. Biesbroek or his buyer reviewed.
My suggestion is for every ancient art dealer or collector who has a piece with Eldarir provenance (and likely nothing to prove its legitimacy aside from its laundering) should really consider contacting HSI's Cultural Property, Arts and Antiquities (CPAA) unit. They know how to google things as well as I do, and contacting them first might save you from embarrassing seizures, and no one wants that now.