Blog Subscription via Follow.it

Showing posts with label Hicham Aboutaam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hicham Aboutaam. Show all posts

October 20, 2025

The Aboutaam Brothers, Phoenix Ancient Art, and the Hidden Routes of Italy’s Lost Antiquities

Phoenix Ancient Art - BRAFA 2019 

With a precautionary seizure order, filed by the Rome Public Prosecutor's Office, led by Prosecutor Stefano Opilio, nearly three hundred ancient Italian artefacts may finally be coming home after years of investigative work marking the judgement as one of Italy's most important cultural recoveries in recent history.  

This recovery finds its roots in a multi-year operation linking the Italian Carabinieri’s Cultural Heritage Protection Command with prosecutors in Rome and the United States, as well as Belgian investigative and judicial authorities.

Acting on a European seizure order issued in July 2025 officials have frozen nearly three hundred artefacts confirmed or strongly suspected to be of Italian origin.  These were identified as being tied to storage facilities in Belgium associated with the owners of the art gallery Phoenix Ancient Art, Hicham and Ali Aboutaam.  

Some of the artefacts identified in this operation coincide with business record documentation police obtained during a lengthy group pf investigations into the illicit dealings of  ancient art dealers Robert Hecht, Giacomo Medici, Gianfranco Becchina and Robin Symes, as well as a large dossier of material recovered from the prolific tomb raider Giuseppe Evangelisti.

While this blog has dedicated ample articles on the problematic art dealers mentioned above, we have never covered Evangelisti in the past.  His involvement in the illicit trade was first identified during Operation Geryon just before Christmas in 2003, when officers overheard a conversation during wire taps which referred to someone nicknamed “Peppino il taglialegna”—Peppino the woodcutter, a name derived from the individual's “day job”, providing firewood to two villages.  At night however, Evangelisti moonlighted as a tombarolo,  scavenging the hillsides for Attic and bucchero ceramics, bronze statues and various terracotta finds primarily used in funerary contexts. 

Luckily for investigators, when they raided Peppino's home near Lake Balsena they found not just the fruit of his recent clandestine labours but a batch of books on a shelf (nine books of agendas and seven albums) which documented the extent of his looting from 1997 to 2002.   A virtual goldmine for investigators, the albums contained photographs of every object he had ever looted, even going so far as to record the depth underground of the objects he illegally excavated.  In her review of these journals and albums, former Villa Giulia employee Daniela Rizzo stated that in her twenty-six years of experience, Evangelisti was the only person, aside from Giacomino (Medici), who recorded such detailed records of his activities. 

But back to the Belgium Recoveries

The recoveries announced today are due in part to the New York investigation into the purchasing activity of problematic hedge fund billionaire Michael Steinhardt who not only surrendered $70 million in plundered antiquities, but was the first collector in the United States to be handed a lifetime ban from antiquities collecting. That District Attorney's Office investigation, conducted by the Antiquities Trafficking Unit in Manhattan, uncovered a series of clandestine networks responsible for supplying looted Mediterranean objects to museums, collectors, and gallerists in the United States. 

Following up on that US investigation, a joint Italian-Belgian investigative team was formed expanding Italy's inquiry into northern Europe’s illicit art-dealing hubs and exploring the Aboutaam's footprint in Belgium.  This European investigation allowed for the cross-referencing of some 283 artefacts identified in Belgium, documented in Italian police databases and dealer archival photos.  That number in turn  demonstrates that despite numerous seizures in the US and Europe, the transnational ancient art market, despite decades of scandals, continues to recycle problematic artefacts extracted from clandestine digs.

According to Italy prosecutors Giovanni Conzo and Stefano Opilio, 132 of the seized works can be definitively linked to Italian sites, while the remaining artefacts almost certainly share the same illicit origin. The order, upheld by the Court of Appeal, described the pieces as the product of “illegal provenance” and repeated violations of cultural-property law.

Through it all Phoenix Ancient Art, long considered one of the most prominent galleries dealing in classical antiquities, once again finds itself at the center of controversy.  While the Aboutaam brothers have not been charged in connection with the Italian-Belgian operation, their business history is inseparable from the problematic story of the antiquities trade. 

In January 2023 at the Geneva police court, Ali Aboutaam was sentenced by the Swiss authorities following a complex and multi-year criminal and procedural investigation by officers and analysts with Switzerland's customs and anti-fraud divisions, working with the Geneva Public Prosecutor's Office.  The Swiss-based merchant had earlier been found guilty of forgery of titles.  In that case the courts also confirmed the seizure of 42 artefacts, confiscated due to their illicit origin. 

For Italian authorities, the current case is less about one gallery than about dismantling a system that has long allowed cultural property to vanish from archaeological landscapes and reappear behind glass cases thousands of kilometres away. The artefacts now bound for Rome belong, by law, to the Italian state’s “unavailable assets,” meaning they can neither be privately owned nor sold and their repatriation signals both a practical and symbolic victory for Italy’s Carabinieri TPC, which has spent decades tracking stolen heritage across the world’s galleries, auction houses and art fairs.

The anticipated return of these objects does more than close a legal chapter, it again  underscores how the same names, archives, and networks continue to bear fruit in terms of recoveries, even twenty years after the Medici conviction and the scandals that rocked museums in the 1990s and early 2000s. The discovery in Brussels suggests that, despite improved international cooperation, large caches of looted antiquities remain hidden in private storage and corporate collections.

April 18, 2025

Final Judgment in Qatar Investment and Projects Development Holding Company & Anor v. Phoenix Ancient Art SA & Ors: A Legal Milestone in Art Market Accountability

I. Introduction

This blog report outlines the legal proceedings and final judgment in the case of Qatar Investment and Projects Development Holding Company & Anor v. Phoenix Ancient Art SA & Ors, culminating in a decision by the England and Wales High Court (King's Bench Division) in April 2025. The case centers on allegations of fraud and misrepresentation concerning the sale of antiquities to Sheikh Hamad Bin Abdullah Al-Thani by Phoenix Ancient Art, based in New York and Geneva.

II. Background

Between 2013 and 2014 Sheikh Hamad Bin Abdullah Al-Thani, through Qatar Investment and Projects Development Holding Company (QIPCO), acquired several antiquities from Phoenix Ancient Art, including:

  • A chalcedony statuette of Nike, purchased for $2.2 million.

  • A marble head of Alexander the Great as Herakles, purchased for $3 million.

al Thani raised concerns in early 2018 about the authenticity of the Nike statue after receiving a report claiming that microscopic inspection detected modern machine tool markings and machine polishing inconsistent with ancient craftsmanship.

III. Legal Proceedings

  • Initial Claims and Limitations: In his initial complaint filed on 22 October 2020 with the high court of London, Sheikh Hamad Bin Abdulla al Thani, represented by the lawyers Pinsent Masons, accused Phoenix Ancient Art of breach of contract and/or negligent misrepresentation on the part of the gallery as the vendor of the $2.2 million Byzantine statuette of Nike whose authenticity is disputed.  Roland Ansermet was also named in the 22 October 2020 UK lawsuit.  In their response, the defendants contested the claims, arguing also that they were time-barred under the Limitation Act 1980. The High Court initially sided with the defendants 27 July 2021 ruling that despite issues related to the Covid 19 pandemic,  the complainant had failed to serve his complaint on Phoenix Ancient Art within the reasonable time limit.  In April 2022 the UK Court of Appeal upheld this decision, emphasising procedural adherence over pandemic-related delays.

  • New Action and Allegations: On 8 September 2023, Sheikh Hamad Bin Abdulla al Thani and QIPCO file a new claim, asserting fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation, and unlawful means conspiracy. The court permitted these claims to proceed, determining they were not clearly time-barred and did not constitute an abuse of process.

  • Summary Judgment: On 4 June 2024, the High Court granted summary judgment in favour of QIPCO, citing Phoenix Ancient Art's failure to disclose critical documents and evidence supporting allegations of fraud and misrepresentation.

IV. Final Judgment and Remedies

On 11 April 2025, the High Court ruled in favour of Sheikh Hamad Bin Abdullah Al-Thani, issuing a summary judgment pursuant to CPR 24.3 against Phoenix Ancient Art, Ali and Hicham Aboutaam, and the retired Swiss antiques dealer, Roland Ansermet concluding that Phoenix Ancient Art had engaged in fraud, dishonesty and fraudulent misrepresentation in relation to al Thani's claim. The court imposed a worldwide asset freeze of $10 million against Phoenix Ancient Art to secure potential damages and costs.

V. Implications

This case underscores the importance of due diligence and transparency in the art and antiquities market.  It highlights the legal responsibilities of dealers to provide accurate provenance information and the potential consequences of misrepresentation. The judgment serves as a precedent for future disputes involving the authenticity of cultural property.

References

  • Qatar Investment and Projects Development Holding Co & Anor v. Phoenix Ancient Art SA & Ors [2024] EWHC 1331 (KB)

  • Qatar Investment and Project Development Holding Company & Anor v. Phoenix Ancient Art SA [2022] EWCA Civ 422

  • "Qatari royal wins court ruling over provenance of £4m antiquities," The Times, April 2025.

By: Alice Bientinesi